Call Number (LC) Title Results
KF228.F667 G74 2011eb Monopoly on wheels : Henry Ford and the Selden automobile patent / 1
KF228.F667 W64 2012 Henry Ford's war on Jews and the legal battle against hate speech / 2
KF228.F67 F67 1850i Testimony in the Forrest divorce case 1
KF228.F67 F67 1851i The Forrest divorce suit report of the trial of Catherine N. Forrest vs. Edwin Forrest for divorce : held in the Superior Court of New York, Dec. 1851 : before Chief Justice Oakley and a special jury / 1
KF228.F67 F67 1852 Report of the Forrest divorce case : containing the full and unabridged testimony of all the witnesses, the affidavits and depositions, together with the Consuelo and Forney letters ; This ed. is published under the direct supervision of the law reporter of the New York Herald and is the only one containing the suppressed testimony. 1
KF228.F67 F67 1852i Report of the Forrest divorce case containing the full and unabridged testimony of all the witnesses, the affidavits and depositions, together with the Consuelo and Forney letters. 1
KF228.F67 F67 1859i William H. Forbes & Mary B. his wife, appellants, against Robert Halsey, respondent 1
KF228.F67 F67 1900i James Forsyth vs. John C. Gauntlett, individually, and as trustee for Mary C. Gauntlett, Georgia McGraw Curtiss, and Joseph W. McGraw, impleaded with others Thomas H. McGraw, Henry Patten, Frederick W. Cameron, as assignee of Henry Patten; Pennington Whitehead, as receiver of the property of Thomas H. McGraw; Mary C. Gauntlett, Georgia McGraw Curtiss, and Joseph W. McGraw. 1
KF228.F67 F67 1910i Lewis Forman, plaintiff-appellant, against Edward H. Bostwick, impleaded with Randolph Horton, et al., defendant-respondent case on appeal.
Lewis L. Forman, plaintiff-appellant, vs.Edward H. Bostwick, et al., defendent-respondent appeal book.
Lewis Forman, plaintiff-appellant, vs. Edward H. Bostwick, et al., defendant-respondent appeal book. 		3
KF228.F67 F677 1863i Catharine N. Forrest against Edwin Forrest
Case of Catharine N. Forrest, plaintiff, against Edwin Forrest, defendant containing the record in the Superior Court of the city of New York, the opinions in that court, the statement and points for each party in the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the latter court. 		2
KF228.F67 R46 1850i A reply to a pamphlet entilled "Remarks on the law of divorce in Pennsylvania, connected with the application of Edwin Forrest for a divorce" 1
KF228.F672 F67 1861i The case of R.B. Forbes versus the American Mutual Life Insurance Company of New Haven, Conn 1
KF228.F685 F685 1925i Fox Film Corporation, plaintiff, against John H. Trumbull 1
KF228.F75 F75 1864i Trial for mal-practice, Frank P. Frisby, by his next friend, Pearson Noble, vs. Dr. Leonard Pratt, in the Circuit Court of Carroll County, State of Illinois, March 7th, 1864 2
KF228.F79 F79 1859i Emilie L. Fry vs. Horace B. Fry petition, answer, and memorial in the matter of the application for a divorce.
Emilie L. Fry's petition for a divorce memorial of John Grigg and exhibits. 		2
KF228.F79 H57 1859i In the matter of the application of Emilie L. Fry to be divorced from Horace B. Fry speeches of Wm. L. Hirst, Esq., and Hon. Thos. Corwin on behalf of Mrs. Emilie L. Fry before the Committee on Divorces of the House of Representatives of the state of Pennsylvania. 1
KF228.F847 F847 1850i Pamphlet containing copies of the specifications and claims of Fowler M. Ray in the the several patents granted to him for vulcanized India-rubber car-springs, and the best method of manufacturing the same : together with a report of the entire testimony on both sides in the case of W.C. Fuller v. F.M. Ray, as taken before the U.S. Commissioner, and certified by him, with the decision of the Patent Office, awarding to F.M. Ray the priority of invention. 1
KF228.F85 F85 1877i John N. Fullmer, respondent, against John DeRemer, appellant 1
KF228.F86 F86 1877i Martha Fullmer, appellant, against John N. Fullmer, respondent 1
KF228.F87 B27 1852i Examination of the validity of the pretended charters of the City of New-York in a review of the decision of the Superior Court in the case of Gabriel Furman, ex. and others, against the mayor, aldermen and commonalty of the City of New-York / 1