Fresh Start : Evaluation Report and Executive Summary / Stephen Gorard, Nadia Siddiqui and Beng Huat See.

Fresh Start (FS) is a catch-up literacy intervention for pupils at risk of falling behind their peers in early secondary schooling. It provides systematic and rigorous practice in phonics so that pupils are at an appropriate level to join the mainstream group after completion of the intervention. Pu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Authors: Gorard, Stephen, Siddiqui, Nadia (Author), See, Beng Huat (Author)
Corporate Authors: Education Endowment Foundation, University of Durham
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 2015.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b10107491
003 CoU
005 20180419112800.7
006 m o d f
007 cr |||||||||||
008 150201s2015 xx |||| ot ||| ||eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed581126 
035 |a (MvI) 6C000000560223 
040 |a ericd  |b eng  |c MvI  |d MvI 
099 |a ED581126 
100 1 |a Gorard, Stephen. 
245 1 0 |a Fresh Start :  |b Evaluation Report and Executive Summary /  |c Stephen Gorard, Nadia Siddiqui and Beng Huat See. 
264 1 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 2015. 
300 |a 1 online resource (37 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a Availability: Education Endowment Foundation. 9th Floor Millbank Tower, Millbank, London, SW1P 4QP, UK. Tel: +44-207-802-1676; e-mail: info@eefoundation.org.uk; Web site: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Abstractor: ERIC.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Secondary Education. 
516 |a Text (Reports, Research) 
520 |a Fresh Start (FS) is a catch-up literacy intervention for pupils at risk of falling behind their peers in early secondary schooling. It provides systematic and rigorous practice in phonics so that pupils are at an appropriate level to join the mainstream group after completion of the intervention. Pupils are assessed and then grouped according to their levels of reading ability. Teaching in these groups begins with recognition, practice and blending of sounds and graphemes, based on a set of module booklets. This evaluation involved 433 pupils in Year 7, in ten secondary schools, who had failed to achieve a "secure" National Curriculum Level 4 (4b and above) in their primary KS2 results for English. Of these, 212 within all schools were randomly allocated to receive the intervention for 22 weeks during their first year at secondary school. This shorter time period was partly justified because the pupils are at secondary school. The other 221 pupils were randomly allocated to a control group in phase one, and received the intervention the following year. The intervention was organised by taking pupils out of regular English lessons for one hour, three times per week. Key conclusions include: (1) Fresh Start shows considerable promise as an effective catch-up intervention for low-attaining readers at the transition phase from primary to secondary school; (2) Pupils must be grouped according to the reading scores obtained from a Fresh Start screening test. Each group has a homogeneous level in terms of pupil reading abilities; (3) Continuous feedback to teachers and support from trainers assists successful implementation; and (4) It is feasible for schools to conduct evaluations of their own planned interventions, under favourable circumstances, and with some advice and oversight from independent expert evaluators. 
524 |a Education Endowment Foundation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Foreign Countries.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Intervention.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Literacy Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a At Risk Students.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Secondary School Students.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Phonics.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Difficulties.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Skills.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Randomized Controlled Trials.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Remedial Reading.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Tests.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Classroom Techniques.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teaching Methods.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Program Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Program Effectiveness.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Institutional Characteristics.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Student Characteristics.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Comparative Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Siddiqui, Nadia,  |e author. 
700 1 |a See, Beng Huat,  |e author. 
710 2 |a Education Endowment Foundation. 
710 2 |a University of Durham. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED581126.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b101074918  |b 07-06-22  |c 04-20-18 
998 |a web  |b 04-20-18  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i b34f3cbe-663c-5a3b-83b9-601ead8f7f2e  |s 32bb0bf7-4ee0-5db9-964f-d6679300afb2 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED581126  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1