Civil liberties vs. national security in a post-9/11 world / edited by M. Katherine B. Darmer, Robert M. Baird, and Stuart E. Rosenbaum.
Saved in:
Online Access: |
Full Text (via Internet Archive) |
---|---|
Other Authors: | , , |
Other title: | Civil liberties versus national security in a post-9/11 world. |
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Amherst, N.Y. :
Prometheus Books,
2004.
|
Series: | Contemporary issues (Buffalo, N.Y.)
|
Subjects: |
Table of Contents:
- "Inter Arma Silent Leges" / by William Rehnquist
- "Lost liberties : Ashcroft and the assault on personal freedom" / by Aryan Neier
- Selections from the US Constitution
- Habeas Corpus Statute : 28 United States Code, Section 2241
- "Bigger monster, weaker chains : the growth of an American surveillance society" / by Jay Stanley and Barry Steinhardt
- Kyllo v. United States, United States Supreme Court
- "No checks, no balances : discarding bedrock constitutional principles" / by Stephen J. Schulhofer
- "Freedom and security after September 11" / by Viet Dinh
- "Fear as institution : 9/11 and surveillance triumphant" / by Christian Parenti
- US v. Korematsu, United States Supreme Court
- "Profiling in the wake of September 11 : the precedent of the Japanese American interment" / by Frank H. Wu
- "The skies won't be safe until we use commonsense profiling" / by Stuart Taylor, Jr.
- "Racial profiling revisited : 'just common sense' in the fight against terror?" / by David A. Harris
- "Guidance regarding the use of race by federal law enforcement agencies" / by the United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division
- "Should the ticking bomb terrorist be tortured? a case study in how a democracy should make tragic choices" / by Alan Dershowitz
- "Torture should not be authorized" / by Philip B. Heymann
- "In torture we trust?" / by Eyal Press
- "Interrogating suspected terrorists : should torture be an option?" / by John T. Parry and Welsh S. White
- Ex parte quirin, United States Supreme Court
- Rumsfeld v. Padilla, Second Circuit Court of Appeals
- "No president is above the U.S. Constitution" / by Nat Hentoff
- "Erring on enemy combatants," Chicago Tribune Editorial.