A postcolonial critique of the Linde et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC "Terrorism" bank cases / Marouf Hasian, Jr.
Offering a postcolonial reading of the case of Linde et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC, this study argues that American courtrooms are being used by rhetors to tell Anglo-American stories about Hamas, the causes of the Second Intifada, and the importance of 'drying up' terrorist financing. While le...
Saved in:
Online Access: |
Full Text (via Springer) |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
[Basingstoke] :
Palgrave Pivot,
2015.
|
Subjects: |
Table of Contents:
- 1. Appreciating the Significance of the Linde et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC 'Terrorism' Bank Cases
- 2. A Critical Genealogical Study of Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Colonial And Imperial Concerns About the Financing of Terrorism
- 3. Critical Reading of the Passage of the 1990 Anti-Terrorism Act and the Filing of the Linde et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC cases
- 4. A Critical Review of the Linde Plaintiffs' Framing of the Role that Financial Institutions Played in the Rise of Hamas, 2000 to 2014
- 5. Situation Factors and the Defense's Framing of Banking Innocence in the Linde et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC Cases
- 6. Conclusion-The Lingering Influence of the Linde et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC cases.