Debating the a priori / Paul Boghossian and Timothy Williamson.

This text records a series of philosophical exchanges between its authors, amounting to a debate extended over more than 15 years. Its subject matter is the nature and scope of reason. A central case at issue is basic logical knowledge, and the justification for basic deductive inferences, but the a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via Oxford Scholarship Online)
Main Authors: Boghossian, Paul A. (Paul Artin), 1957- (Author), Williamson, Timothy (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2020.
Edition:First edition.
Series:Oxford scholarship online.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000ui 4500
001 b11485916
003 CoU
005 20201017003030.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 200925s2020 enk fob 001 0|eng|d
020 |a 9780191886317 (ebook) 
035 |a (StDuBDS)edz0002341876 
040 |a StDuBDS  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c StDuBDS 
050 4 |a BD181 
100 1 |a Boghossian, Paul A.  |q (Paul Artin),  |d 1957-  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n86081372  |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000109713451. 
245 1 0 |a Debating the a priori /  |c Paul Boghossian and Timothy Williamson. 
250 |a First edition. 
264 1 |a Oxford :  |b Oxford University Press,  |c 2020. 
300 |a 1 online resource (288 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier. 
490 1 |a Oxford scholarship online. 
500 |a This edition also issued in print: 2020. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
520 8 |a This text records a series of philosophical exchanges between its authors, amounting to a debate extended over more than 15 years. Its subject matter is the nature and scope of reason. A central case at issue is basic logical knowledge, and the justification for basic deductive inferences, but the arguments range far more widely, at stake the distinctions between analytic and synthetic, and between a priori and a posteriori. The discussion naturally involves problems about the conditions for linguistic understanding and competence, and what it might be to grasp a concept or to have an intuition. Since reason is central to philosophical method, there are associated implications for how philosophy itself works, or should work. In particular, the discussion raises fundamental concerns about how to approach epistemology. 
521 |a Specialized. 
588 |a Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on September 25, 2020) 
650 0 |a Knowledge, Theory of.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85072732. 
650 0 |a Intuition.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067653. 
650 0 |a A priori.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85000019. 
650 0 |a Inference.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85066082. 
650 0 |a Comprehension.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85029421. 
700 1 |a Williamson, Timothy,  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n90665594  |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000121238307. 
776 0 8 |i Print version :  |z 9780198851707. 
830 0 |a Oxford scholarship online.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2006024588. 
856 4 0 |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851707.001.0001  |z Full Text (via Oxford Scholarship Online) 
907 |a .b114859164  |b 12-01-20  |c 11-30-20 
998 |a web  |b 11-30-20  |c b  |d b   |e -  |f eng  |g enk  |h 0  |i 1 
907 |a .b114859164  |b 11-30-20  |c 11-30-20 
944 |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED 
956 |a Oxford Scholarship Online 
999 f f |i 5693208d-41e7-5b26-ac6d-6d3723fc582d  |s d4c37640-7079-56f9-8d12-3ee08979e148 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e BD181  |h Library of Congress classification  |i web  |n 1