Static and Emergent Thinking in Spatial and Quantitative Coordinate Systems / Teo Paoletti, Hwa Young Lee and Hamilton L. Hardison.

The body of research examining students' graphing understandings across STEM fields indicates students are not developing productive meanings for graphs. We conjecture such failings may, in part, be explainable by features of students' use of coordinate systems and graphing activity that a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Authors: Paoletti, Teo, Lee, Hwa Young (Author), Hardison, Hamilton L. (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 2018.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b11774237
003 CoU
005 20210325115130.2
006 m o d f
007 cr |||||||||||
008 180101s2018 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed606704 
035 |a (MvI) 1G000000585126 
040 |a ericd  |b eng  |c MvI  |d MvI 
099 |a ED606704 
100 1 |a Paoletti, Teo. 
245 1 0 |a Static and Emergent Thinking in Spatial and Quantitative Coordinate Systems /  |c Teo Paoletti, Hwa Young Lee and Hamilton L. Hardison. 
264 1 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 2018. 
300 |a 1 online resource (8 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a Availability: North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. e-mail: pmena.steeringcommittee@gmail.com; Web site: http://www.pmena.org/.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Abstractor: As Provided.  |5 ericd. 
516 |a Text (Speeches/Meeting Papers) 
516 |a Text (Reports, Evaluative) 
520 |a The body of research examining students' graphing understandings across STEM fields indicates students are not developing productive meanings for graphs. We conjecture such failings may, in part, be explainable by features of students' use of coordinate systems and graphing activity that are under examined. In this theoretical report, we present a conceptual analysis of different ways students may reason about graphs and coordinate systems. Specifically, we describe two different uses of coordinate systems--spatial and quantitative--students might leverage and two ways of reasoning--static and emergent--students might engage in as they construct or interpret graphs. We characterize how a student may engage in each kind of reasoning in each use of coordinate system. We intend this paper to serve as a theoretical lens for future empirical studies examining students' developing graphing understandings. [For the complete proceedings, see ED606531.] 
524 |a North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (40th, Greenville, SC, Nov 15-18, 2018).  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a STEM Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Graphs.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Logical Thinking.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Spatial Ability.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Mathematical Concepts.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Cognitive Processes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Visual Aids.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Measurement.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Lee, Hwa Young,  |e author. 
700 1 |a Hardison, Hamilton L.,  |e author. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606704.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b117742375  |b 11-30-21  |c 04-01-21 
998 |a web  |b 04-01-21  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 0 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i be82c081-1bdc-55e8-8362-9280502030ff  |s a1feeea5-c7e2-576a-986c-41b77d7f96e0