|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nam a22000003u 4500 |
| 001 |
b5648852 |
| 003 |
CoU |
| 005 |
20091106025931.0 |
| 006 |
m d f |
| 007 |
cr un |
| 008 |
091215e19960501dcu s| f1|||||eng|d |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (TOE)ost231530
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (TOE)231530
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a TOE
|c TOE
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a GDWR
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a 5
|2 edbsc
|
| 086 |
0 |
|
|a E 1.99:CONF-960648--5
|
| 086 |
0 |
|
|a E 1.99:ANL/EA/CP--88164
|
| 086 |
0 |
|
|a E 1.99:CONF-960648--5
|
| 088 |
|
|
|a ANL/EA/CP--88164
|
| 088 |
|
|
|a CONF-960648--5
|
| 088 |
|
|
|a DE96010794
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Facilitating relative comparisons of health impacts from postulated accidents in environmental impact statements
|h [electronic resource]
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C. :
|b United States. Dept. of Energy ;
|a Oak Ridge, Tenn. :
|b distributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy,
|c 1996.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 12 p.
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent.
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia.
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Published through the Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a 05/01/1996.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a "ANL/EA/CP--88164"
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a "CONF-960648--5"
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a "DE96010794"
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a 21. annual conference of the National Association of Environmental Professionals: practical environmental directions - a changing agenda, Houston, TX (United States), 2-6 Jun 1996.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Mueller, C.J.
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a Current US Department of Energy (DOE) guidance on the performance of accident analyses supported an environmental impact statement (EIS) stresses a graded approach that emphasizes the most important risks, calls for the evaluation of frequencies as well as consequences for severe accident scenarios, and discourages the use of bounding analyses that confound risk comparisons among EIS alternatives. This paper discusses methods in probabilistic risk analysis that were developed and applied in defining accidents and generating radiological source terms for the DOE Draft Waste Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (WM PEIS); publication of the Final WM PEIS is due in late summer 1996. The strengths and shortcomings of the cited probabilistic risk analysis methods used to evaluate facility accidents are addressed, both as they relate to the WM PEIS and as they relate to more general EIS applications. Key guidance is discussed that was developed by DOE and used in shaping the techniques cited herein for application in an EIS. Related perceptions on accidents observed from the public comment process for the WM PEIS are cited. Finally, recommendations are made on the basis of needs as well as lessons learned in implementing the accident analysis for the WM PEIS.
|
| 536 |
|
|
|b W-31109-ENG-38.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Environmental Impact Statements.
|2 local.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Planning.
|2 local.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Hazardous Materials.
|2 local.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Health Hazards.
|2 local.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Radioactive Materials.
|2 local.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Radiation Hazards.
|2 local.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Risk Assessment.
|2 local.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Probability.
|2 local.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Comparative Evaluations.
|2 local.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Nuclear Fuels ;29 Energy Planning And Policy.
|2 edbsc.
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a Argonne National Laboratory.
|4 res.
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a United States.
|b Department of Energy.
|4 spn.
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a United States.
|b Department of Energy.
|b Office of Scientific and Technical Information.
|4 dst.
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/231530-6rPRON/webviewable/
|z Online Access
|
| 907 |
|
|
|a .b5648852x
|b 03-06-23
|c 12-19-09
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a web
|b 12-19-09
|c f
|d m
|e p
|f eng
|g dcu
|h 0
|i 1
|
| 956 |
|
|
|a Information bridge
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 2e133412-a66e-545e-a4e7-26e9f1559da7
|s b2d8bae7-386e-553c-bbc9-1bf61bcc5587
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Can circulate
|a University of Colorado Boulder
|b Online
|c Online
|d Online
|e E 1.99:CONF-960648--5
|h Superintendent of Documents classification
|i web
|n 1
|
