Some Comments on "The Unit of Analysis [microform] : Group Means Versus Individual Observations." / R. Clifford Blair and J. J. Higgins.
R. V. Hopkins (1982) has criticized the use of means as the unit of analysis in situations where intact groups, such as classes, rather than individuals have been randomly assigned to various treatment conditions. Instead, Hopkins advocated the use of certain analysis of variance (ANOVA) models that...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Request ERIC Document |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Microfilm Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[S.l.] :
Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
1984.
|
| Subjects: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | b6174432 | ||
| 003 | CoU | ||
| 007 | he u||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 840101s1984 xx |||| b ||| | eng d | ||
| 005 | 20240722204745.2 | ||
| 035 | |a (ERIC)ed323219 | ||
| 035 | |a (MvI) 3W000000316082 | ||
| 040 | |a ericd |c MvI |d MvI | ||
| 099 | |f ERIC DOC # |a ED323219 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Blair, R. Clifford. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Some Comments on "The Unit of Analysis |h [microform] : |b Group Means Versus Individual Observations." / |c R. Clifford Blair and J. J. Higgins. |
| 260 | |a [S.l.] : |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, |c 1984. | ||
| 300 | |a 18 p. | ||
| 336 | |a text |2 rdacontent. | ||
| 337 | |a microform |2 rdamedia. | ||
| 338 | |a microfiche |2 rdacarrier. | ||
| 500 | |a ERIC Document Number: ED323219. | ||
| 500 | |a Educational level discussed: Elementary Secondary Education. | ||
| 520 | |a R. V. Hopkins (1982) has criticized the use of means as the unit of analysis in situations where intact groups, such as classes, rather than individuals have been randomly assigned to various treatment conditions. Instead, Hopkins advocated the use of certain analysis of variance (ANOVA) models that, as far as test for treatment effects are concerned, yield results that are equivalent to those that would be obtained if class means were used as the unit of analysis. It is pointed out that, because of the non-robustness of the sample mean as an estimator of location, use of the class mean as the unit of analysis or of the ANOVA models advocated by Hopkins can lead to larger than necessary Type II error rates in tests of significance for treatment effects. The ways in which, in non-normal population situations, use of summary statistics other than the mean can lead to significant increases in the power of tests for treatment effects are discussed. It is also suggested that the pooling options offered by Hopkins should be viewed with caution. Two data tables are included. (Author/SLD) | ||
| 524 | |a Florida Journal of Educational Research, v26 n1 p5-20 Fall 1984. |2 ericd. | ||
| 533 | |a Microfiche. |b [Washington D.C.]: |c ERIC Clearinghouse |e microfiches : positive. | ||
| 583 | 1 | |a committed to retain |c 20240101 |d 2049101 |5 CoU |f Alliance Shared Trust |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies | |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Analysis of Variance. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Classrooms. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Comparative Analysis. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Elementary Secondary Education. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Mathematical Models. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Observation. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Robustness (Statistics) |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sampling. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Statistical Significance. |2 ericd. |
| 700 | 1 | |a Higgins, J. J., |e author. | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 |z Request ERIC Document |
| 907 | |a .b61744323 |b 01-18-22 |c 10-10-10 | ||
| 998 | |a pas |b 04-10-12 |c f |d m |e - |f eng |g xx |h 0 |i 1 | ||
| 956 | |a ERIC | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i f7723785-a4fe-5b73-aaf9-bda9bbe45b5e |s b8d0db73-15bc-526d-bfa2-7b5260f54f01 |
| 952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Boulder Campus |c Offsite |d PASCAL Offsite |e ED323219 |h Other scheme |i microfiche |n 1 |