Strategic Activity in Story Comprehension at Two Levels of Reader Proficiency [microform] / Stephen Phelps.

To investigate the higher level comprehension strategies used by children reading basal reader stories, a study compared the results of an earlier investigation of 50 fourth grade level readers' comprehension strategies with findings gained from 30 subjects using a sixth grade basal reader. Sub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Phelps, Stephen
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1983.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6184252
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 831202s1983 xx |||| b ||| s eng d
005 20240722204920.5
035 |a (ERIC)ed240503 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED240503 
100 1 |a Phelps, Stephen. 
245 1 0 |a Strategic Activity in Story Comprehension at Two Levels of Reader Proficiency  |h [microform] /  |c Stephen Phelps. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1983. 
300 |a 15 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference (33rd, Austin, TX, November 29-December 3, 1983).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED240503. 
520 |a To investigate the higher level comprehension strategies used by children reading basal reader stories, a study compared the results of an earlier investigation of 50 fourth grade level readers' comprehension strategies with findings gained from 30 subjects using a sixth grade basal reader. Subjects were asked to read aloud from a basal and stop after each sentence to tell what they had been thinking or doing while reading the material. Results showed that similar strategies were used at both reading levels. Inference, personal identification, reference to previous experience, image, evaluation, stated failure to understand, hypothesis, and self-correction were used in both samples, while self interrogation, back reference, and definition were found among the younger group. An analysis of the responses showed considerable variability in the strategies students chose. Strategy use appeared to vary more as a function of individual reader preference and text than of developmental stage or reader proficiency. (MM) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 2049101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies  
650 0 7 |a Age Differences.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Basal Reading.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Comparative Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Grade 4.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Grade 6.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Intermediate Grades.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Learning Strategies.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Metacognition.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reader Response.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Comprehension.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Habits.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Strategies.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b61842527  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-10-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-10-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 10aa2645-0f81-5beb-a27b-10d744b8eeab  |s ce7124e8-c523-5fcf-85c8-b75ff7bf7c54 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED240503  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1