Financial and Program Comparisons of Missouri Public Four-Year Institutions to Peer Institutions. Master Plan III Assessment. Project Report Number Six [microform]

As part of an evaluation of the Missouri master plan for higher education, data comparing Missouri public four-year institutions with their peer institutions was collected and analyzed. Comparisons were made on the percentage distribution of revenues and expenditures per student over a range of cate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Corporate Author: Missouri. Coordinating Board for Higher Education
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1984.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6188888
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 840401s1984 xx |||| bs ||| | eng d
005 20240722193358.4
035 |a (ERIC)ed248810 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED248810 
110 1 |a Missouri.  |b Coordinating Board for Higher Education. 
245 1 0 |a Financial and Program Comparisons of Missouri Public Four-Year Institutions to Peer Institutions. Master Plan III Assessment. Project Report Number Six  |h [microform] 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1984. 
300 |a 135 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Note: For related documents, see ED 241 083, HE 017 676-679.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED248810. 
520 |a As part of an evaluation of the Missouri master plan for higher education, data comparing Missouri public four-year institutions with their peer institutions was collected and analyzed. Comparisons were made on the percentage distribution of revenues and expenditures per student over a range of categories. Comparisons were also made on various program characteristics by level and discipline. The distribution of revenues and expenditures of the Missouri institutions over 2 fiscal years was also compared. The peer institutions were selected from a group of peer states. In comparing the Missouri institutions to their peers, it was found that, in general, the peer institutions spent more per student than did the Missouri institutions. While the Missouri institutions tended to spend a larger percentage of their total budgets for instruction, this was compensated for in the majority of the institutions by lower expenditures for research, student aid, and building operation and maintenance. In general, Missouri institutions also awarded a greater percentage of total degrees in the occupational/professional disciplines than did their peers. Missouri institutions had an increase in the percentage of total revenues generated from tuition and fees, and a decrease in revenues from state and federal aid. (SW) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 20490101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies 
650 1 7 |a College Programs.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Comparative Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Degrees (Academic)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Expenditure per Student.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Income.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Master Plans.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a State Colleges.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a State Universities.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b61888886  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-10-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-10-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 728a2ab4-b772-58a6-95e3-73f037480257  |s 899cd3fa-b7ca-5024-aea2-2796e790429b 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED248810  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1