Competition, Non-Competition, and Race as Determinants of Outgroup Discrimination [microform] / Dalmas A. Taylor and Beatrice Moriarty.

The present experiment investigated factors which enhance the salience of group membership and consequent ingroup bias. Subject dyads, who were always white, interacted either competitively or interdependently with either white or black confederate dyads. Ingroup bias was assessed as a function of a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Taylor, Dalmas A.
Other Authors: Moriarty, Beatrice
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1985.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6196353
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 850101s1985 xx |||| bt ||| | eng d
005 20240722191255.6
035 |a (ERIC)ed261926 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED261926 
100 1 |a Taylor, Dalmas A. 
245 1 0 |a Competition, Non-Competition, and Race as Determinants of Outgroup Discrimination  |h [microform] /  |c Dalmas A. Taylor and Beatrice Moriarty. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1985. 
300 |a 18 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED261926. 
520 |a The present experiment investigated factors which enhance the salience of group membership and consequent ingroup bias. Subject dyads, who were always white, interacted either competitively or interdependently with either white or black confederate dyads. Ingroup bias was assessed as a function of attraction toward the outgroup (experimental confederates) relative to the ingroup (naive subjects). The greater the difference between ingroup and outgroup attraction, the greater the ingroup bias. Results demonstrated that ingroup bias was greater when groups were competitive than when they were interdependent, and greater when the outgroup was black than when the outgroup was white. Further, the greatest ingroup bias resulted when a white ingroup was competitive with a black outgroup. These findings were discussed in terms of social identity/social comparison theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and the etiology of social competition (Turner, 1975). (Author) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 20490101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies 
650 1 7 |a Competition.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Group Activities.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Group Behavior.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Group Membership.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Intergroup Relations.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Racial Bias.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Social Behavior.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Social Discrimination.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Social Integration.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Social Networks.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Social Science Research.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Moriarty, Beatrice. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b61963537  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-10-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-10-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 0a57ec39-a757-5c2c-bf92-fde16dd899a0  |s f9bb3501-c725-5586-9d5d-ceca72b6477c 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED261926  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1