How Well Do the Angoff Design V Linear Equating Methods Stack Up against the Tucker and Levine Methods? [microform] / Ronald T. Cope.
Comparisons were made of three Angoff Design V linear equating methods (two forms equated to a common test, two forms predicted by a common test, or two forms used to predict a common test) and Tucker's and R. Levine's linear methods, under common item linear equating with non-equivalent p...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Request ERIC Document |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Microfilm Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[Place of publication not identified] :
Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
1986.
|
| Subjects: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000002u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | b6200443 | ||
| 003 | CoU | ||
| 007 | he u||024|||| | ||
| 008 | 860401s1986 xx |||| b ||| s eng d | ||
| 005 | 20241104190109.1 | ||
| 035 | |a (ERIC)ed269461 | ||
| 040 | |a ericd |c ericd |d MvI | ||
| 099 | |f ERIC DOC # |a ED269461 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cope, Ronald T. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2011184755 |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000139810906 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How Well Do the Angoff Design V Linear Equating Methods Stack Up against the Tucker and Levine Methods? |h [microform] / |c Ronald T. Cope. |
| 260 | |a [Place of publication not identified] : |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, |c 1986. | ||
| 300 | |a 32 pages | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent. | ||
| 337 | |a microform |b h |2 rdamedia. | ||
| 338 | |a microfiche |b he |2 rdacarrier. | ||
| 583 | 1 | |a committed to retain |c 20240101 |d 20490101 |5 CoU |f Alliance Shared Trust |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies | |
| 500 | |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (70th, San Francisco, CA, April 16-20, 1986). |5 ericd. | ||
| 500 | |a ERIC Document Number: ED269461. | ||
| 520 | |a Comparisons were made of three Angoff Design V linear equating methods (two forms equated to a common test, two forms predicted by a common test, or two forms used to predict a common test) and Tucker's and R. Levine's linear methods, under common item linear equating with non-equivalent populations. Forms of a professional certification test administered to over 78,000 applicants were equated under the five different methods, using single-link equating of selected pairs of forms and cyclical equating of selected forms to themselves via equating chains. In addition, the five methods were tried on a set of hypothetical situations involving parallel or congeneric forms and anchor tests. In the single-link equatings, raw score equivalents by the Angoff methods tended to fall between those obtained with the Tucker and Levine methods. The chain equatings produced similar estimated bias and estimated root-mean-squared error of score equivalents for the five different methods. Results of equating in the hypothetical situations appeared consistent with the manner in which they were constructed and with the assumptions underlying the five different equating methods. (GDC) | ||
| 521 | 8 | |a Researchers. |b ericd. | |
| 533 | |a Microfiche. |b [Washington D.C.]: |c ERIC Clearinghouse |e microfiches : positive. | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Certification. |2 ericd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Comparative Analysis. |2 ericd |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Equated Scores. |2 ericd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Higher Education. |2 ericd |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Mathematical Models. |2 ericd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Occupational Tests. |2 ericd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Professional Occupations. |2 ericd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Raw Scores. |2 ericd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Simulation. |2 ericd |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Statistical Bias. |2 ericd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Statistical Studies. |2 ericd |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Test Theory. |2 ericd |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |z Request ERIC Document |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 |
| 907 | |a .b62004438 |b 01-18-22 |c 10-10-10 | ||
| 944 | |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED | ||
| 998 | |a pas |b 10-10-10 |c f |d m |e - |f eng |g xx |h 0 |i 1 | ||
| 956 | |a ERIC | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i eafea976-48ab-59cc-b66a-175b33bf7f67 |s 52da74cb-5bea-5209-a2cc-f6c0b0b4bb79 |
| 952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Boulder Campus |c Offsite |d PASCAL Offsite |e ED269461 |h Other scheme |i microfiche |n 1 |