Why Did They Run? [microform] / Harold E. Jakes.

The 1982 school board elections in the geographical and political Ottawa-Carleton (Ontario) regions gave rise to a record number of new candidates for election to the two public and two separate school boards that comprise the region. This paper examines some of the reasons for the dramatic increase...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Jakes, Harold E.
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1983.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6203953
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 830101s1983 xx |||| bt ||| | eng d
005 20240722210629.2
035 |a (ERIC)ed276125 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED276125 
100 1 |a Jakes, Harold E. 
245 1 0 |a Why Did They Run?  |h [microform] /  |c Harold E. Jakes. 
260 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1983. 
300 |a 6 pages 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |b h  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |b he  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED276125. 
520 |a The 1982 school board elections in the geographical and political Ottawa-Carleton (Ontario) regions gave rise to a record number of new candidates for election to the two public and two separate school boards that comprise the region. This paper examines some of the reasons for the dramatic increase and develops a profile of their characteristics. Results of an interpretative-theoretical type of qualitative analysis show that neither proposed increases in honoraria nor changes in the term of office (from 2 to 3 years) were factors in candidates' decisions to run. Major concerns and predominant issues which affected their candidacy, in rank order, were: (1) lack of communication by the boards, (2) monetary and taxation concerns, (3) school closures, (4) special education, (5) quality education, and (6) public funding of Catholic education. Many new candidates were deeply concerned with the impersonal community relations of large, bureaucratic school systems and school boards' appointed officials. A great majority of the new candidates came from the upper three classes of society, held at least one university degree, had close associations with education, and had been politically active in the past in some community group or organization. Nine references are appended. Two tables and one figure are included. (IW) 
521 8 |a Policymakers.  |b ericd. 
521 8 |a Researchers.  |b ericd. 
524 |a Ontario Education, p18-22 Mar-Apr 1983.  |2 ericd. 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 2049101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies  
650 0 7 |a Attitudes.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Background.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Board Candidates.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Boards of Education.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Decision Making.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Demography.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Secondary Education.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Foreign Countries.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Motivation.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Politics of Education.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Profiles.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Public Opinion.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a School Community Relationship.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Trustees.  |2 ericd 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b62039532  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-10-10 
944 |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED 
998 |a pas  |b 10-10-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i bf6d8550-cff0-5dd4-9922-fa7d8cee6eb9  |s 0f29ae74-388a-5c98-9066-354de7d2d97b 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED276125  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1