Student Evaluation of Teaching [microform] : Research and Recommendations / Abram G. Konrad.

This paper provides an overview of instructional evaluation in higher education with a special emphasis upon student evaluation of teaching. The paper includes an examination of the context for evaluation, components of evaluation, and research on student evaluation of instruction, and it proposes a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Konrad, Abram G.
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1986.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6206033
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 860601s1986 xx |||| b ||| | eng d
005 20240722205014.8
035 |a (ERIC)ed279658 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED279658 
100 1 |a Konrad, Abram G. 
245 1 0 |a Student Evaluation of Teaching  |h [microform] :  |b Research and Recommendations /  |c Abram G. Konrad. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1986. 
300 |a 45 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper prepared for the Committee for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning, the University of Alberta.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED279658. 
520 |a This paper provides an overview of instructional evaluation in higher education with a special emphasis upon student evaluation of teaching. The paper includes an examination of the context for evaluation, components of evaluation, and research on student evaluation of instruction, and it proposes a series of recommendations for the implementation of student evaluations. A major portion of the paper reviews selected research literature regarding such matters as the validity, reliability, influential factors, instrumentation, administration, and impact of student evaluation of teaching. Research evidence on the impact of student ratings on the improvement of teaching is also examined. The kind of rating scales that should be used and how rating forms should be administered are considered. An eight-page reference list concludes the document. (JD) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 2049101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies  
650 1 7 |a College Faculty.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Educational Assessment.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation Criteria.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Instructional Improvement.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Program Effectiveness.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Effectiveness.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Improvement.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b62060338  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-10-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-10-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 80444cf7-92a3-5ff3-9e6f-6791012ca952  |s 6c652634-2540-5e9d-8280-0c22353f16bd 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED279658  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1