Language Testing in the 1990s: How Far Have We Come? [microform] : How Much Further Have We to Go? / J. Charles Alderson.

A discussion of trends and progress in language testing looks at movement in the field since 1980, based on the themes and content of national and international conferences; trends in test content, method, and analysis; and work on the nature of proficiency and of language learning. It is proposed t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Alderson, J. Charles
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1991.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6229646
003 CoU
005 20130402083825.2
006 m o d f
007 cr |||||||||||
008 910101s1991 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed365145 
035 |a (MvI) 9D000000358005 
040 |a ericd  |c MvI  |d MvI 
099 |a ED365145 
099 |a ED365145 
100 1 |a Alderson, J. Charles. 
245 1 0 |a Language Testing in the 1990s: How Far Have We Come?  |h [microform] :  |b How Much Further Have We to Go? /  |c J. Charles Alderson. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1991. 
300 |a 27 p. 
500 |a ERIC Note: In: Sarinee, Anivan, Ed. Current Developments in Language Testing. Anthology Series 25. Paper presented at the Regional Language Centre Seminar on Language Testing and Language Programme Evaluation (April 9-12, 1990); see FL 021 757.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a A discussion of trends and progress in language testing looks at movement in the field since 1980, based on the themes and content of national and international conferences; trends in test content, method, and analysis; and work on the nature of proficiency and of language learning. It is proposed that movement evidenced by conferences is largely sideways and backward; that while improvements have been made in test content, method, and analysis, there is little evidence that these improvements represent real advancements; and that research on the nature of proficiency and of language learning is still in its early stages. Four main reasons are given for the lack of progress: the relative youth of the discipline; dearth of replication, teamwork, and agenda in research; inadequacy of funding; and lack of a coherent framework or model. Areas in which attention will be important in the next decade are outlined, including: research on language learning; the washback effect of testing; validity of test content; knowledge of the structure of language proficiency; computer- based language testing and the impact of technology on testing; learner-centered testing; the role of judgment in language testing; and traditional concerns about test validity and reliability. (MSE) 
650 0 7 |a Computer Assisted Testing.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Conferences.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Trends.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Financial Support.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Futures (of Society)  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Intellectual Disciplines.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Language Proficiency.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Language Tests.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Research Needs.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Second Language Learning.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Second Languages.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Test Reliability.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Test Validity.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Testing.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Testing Problems.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Trend Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED365145.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b62296462  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-10-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 0b64dd00-26a1-51c4-9059-b42e97b071a4  |s 975ab9e1-c5c5-51c5-ac1e-bc45df7f5912 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED365145  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1