Offering Choice in Teacher Education [electronic resource] / Arthur E. Smith.

A teacher educator incorporates active involvement of students and choice in two different college classrooms. The first class was an undergraduate reading/literacy education class. Students were offered the choice of the RAP (Reading Addiction Process) option or taking the final exam. Students read...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Smith, Arthur E.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1993.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6236508
003 CoU
005 20080220152030.8
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 931105s1993 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed373308 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED373308 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED373308 
100 1 |a Smith, Arthur E. 
245 1 0 |a Offering Choice in Teacher Education  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Arthur E. Smith. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1993. 
300 |a 14 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED373308. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the College Reading Association (37th, Richmond, VA, November 5, 1993).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a A teacher educator incorporates active involvement of students and choice in two different college classrooms. The first class was an undergraduate reading/literacy education class. Students were offered the choice of the RAP (Reading Addiction Process) option or taking the final exam. Students read materials of their own choice on a daily basis. Requiring daily reading was intended to help form habits in a way that infrequent or irregular practice would not. At the end of the semester, students wrote a brief reflective paper in which they considered their growth as readers. In a graduate-level course intended to acquaint students with findings and trends in recent reading research, groups of four or five students were responsible for designing and carrying out a modest piece of research. Allowing each group to choose its own research question contributed to the active involvement that characterized the research projects. The element of choice in these courses made a difference for many teachers and prospective teachers. It seems to have been particularly effective in fostering self-confidence and developing new habits. (RS) 
650 0 7 |a Class Activities.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Cooperative Learning.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Independent Reading.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Methods Courses.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Interests.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Materials.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Recreational Reading.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Education.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED373308.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b62365083  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-10-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i f95c5c57-4939-5d9e-b33e-3ebc3e77e5c6  |s ce849c94-b7a6-577e-8791-22d57a792044 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED373308  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1