Effects and interactions of auditory and visual cues in oral communication [microform] / John W. Keys and Others.

Visual and auditory cues were tested, separately and jointly, to determine the degree of their contribution to improving overall speech skills of the aurally handicapped. Eight sound intensity levels (from 6 to 15 decibels) were used in presenting phonetically balanced word lists and multiple-choice...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Keys, John W.
Corporate Author: University of Oklahoma. Research Institute
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1960.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6250306
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 600101s1960 xx |||| b ||| | eng d
005 20240722192535.8
035 |a (ERIC)ed002887 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
088 |a CRP-499 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED002887 
100 1 |a Keys, John W. 
245 1 0 |a Effects and interactions of auditory and visual cues in oral communication  |h [microform] /  |c John W. Keys and Others. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1960. 
300 |a 37 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a Contract Number: OEC-SAE-8277.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED002887. 
520 |a Visual and auditory cues were tested, separately and jointly, to determine the degree of their contribution to improving overall speech skills of the aurally handicapped. Eight sound intensity levels (from 6 to 15 decibels) were used in presenting phonetically balanced word lists and multiple-choice intelligibility lists to a sample of 24 subjects. The subjects were divided equally into three groups--(1) those with normal hearing, (2) those with relatively "flat" hearing loss, and (3) those with "dropping" or "sloping" hearing loss. Scores, consisting of the number of correct responses, were obtained with auditory and visual cues, alone and through an interaction of both as a function of discrete intensity increase. Analysis of the various effects and interactions was conducted through the use of variance technIQues. The ability to interpret correctly spoken language with the bisensory approach greatly exceeded that yielded by either audition or vision in isolation. Future attempts to rehabilitate an individual whose hearing is impaired through lipreading instruction and auditory training should thus combine these two types of training into a unified instructional program. (jh) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 20490101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies 
650 0 7 |a Audiovisual Aids.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Auditory Discrimination.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Auditory Perception.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Auditory Tests.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Handicapped Children.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Hearing Impairments.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Learning Experience.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Lipreading.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Oral Communication Method.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Sensory Experience.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Speech Communication.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Speech Skills.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Vision Tests.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Visual Perception.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a University of Oklahoma.  |b Research Institute. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b62503066  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-12-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-12-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 7388626e-a474-5342-a259-196703d49442  |s df8773b7-476a-5940-a18e-48b1ca9d45d6 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED002887  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1