A Comparison of Three Types of Item Analysis in Test Development Using Classical and Latent Trait Methods [microform] / Jeri Benson and Others.

The precision and efficiency of a cognitive test constructed by three different methods of item analysis was compared, using the verbal aptitude subtest of the Florida Twelfth Grade Test. Classical item analysis, factor analysis and the Rasch logistic model were used in the construction of 15 and 30...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Benson, Jeri
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1978.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6269627
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 780301s1978 xx |||| bt ||| | eng d
005 20241104190328.7
035 |a (ERIC)ed163039 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED163039 
100 1 |a Benson, Jeri. 
245 1 2 |a A Comparison of Three Types of Item Analysis in Test Development Using Classical and Latent Trait Methods  |h [microform] /  |c Jeri Benson and Others. 
260 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1978. 
300 |a 52 pages 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |b h  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |b he  |2 rdacarrier. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 20490101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (Toronto, Ontario, Canada, March, 1978).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED163039. 
520 |a The precision and efficiency of a cognitive test constructed by three different methods of item analysis was compared, using the verbal aptitude subtest of the Florida Twelfth Grade Test. Classical item analysis, factor analysis and the Rasch logistic model were used in the construction of 15 and 30 item subtests and replicated for samples of 250, 500, and 995 high school seniors. The study was designed in three phases: (1) item selection: (2) double cross-validation of the selected items: and (3) statistical analyses of the test and item characteristics. The results of the analysis showed that there were no apparent differences in the types of tests produced by the three methods of item analysis with regard to the precision of measurement. However, in terms of test efficiency, the results indicated substantive differences in the tests produced by the three methods of item analysis for students with varying ability levels. (Author/CTM) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
650 0 7 |a Cognitive Tests.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Comparative Analysis.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Efficiency.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Factor Analysis.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a High Schools.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Item Analysis.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Item Banks.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Latent Trait Theory.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Test Construction.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Test Items.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Test Reliability.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Verbal Ability.  |2 ericd 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b62696270  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-12-10 
944 |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED 
998 |a pas  |b 10-12-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 2  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 275fa88d-30cd-5425-b6ef-68e4ba86a149  |s 57d29bad-86d2-5bb5-8339-6f67bcc5f9eb 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED163039  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1