Contrastive Rhetoric [microform] : Diagnosing Problems in Coherence / Barbara Albrecht McDaniel.

An examination of the stylistic differences among writing from literary specialists, from science, and from social science shows that a more precise diagnosis of the writing problems of clarity and coherence is possible. Ten randomly selected paragraphs from each of four publications, the "Cana...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: McDaniel, Barbara Albrecht
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1979.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6278037
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 790401s1979 xx |||| b ||| s eng d
005 20240722191545.2
035 |a (ERIC)ed176300 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED176300 
100 1 |a McDaniel, Barbara Albrecht. 
245 1 0 |a Contrastive Rhetoric  |h [microform] :  |b Diagnosing Problems in Coherence /  |c Barbara Albrecht McDaniel. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1979. 
300 |a 17 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (30th, Minneapolis, Minnesota, April 5-7, 1979).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED176300. 
520 |a An examination of the stylistic differences among writing from literary specialists, from science, and from social science shows that a more precise diagnosis of the writing problems of clarity and coherence is possible. Ten randomly selected paragraphs from each of four publications, the "Canadian Medical Association Journal," the "Canadian Journal of Political Science,""Canadian Literature," and "Publications of the Modern Language Association," were analyzed, using Robert Kaplan's functional rhetoric of English prose as a model. In the samples that were hardest to read, authors had failed to establish topics forcefully and to pick them up and trace them through the discourse blocs with effective sentence structure. Results of the study indicated three generalizations necessary to identifying problems of coherence: English prose usually proceeds from generalizations to specifics; it is usually unsympathetic toward tangential topics; and good writers of English pick up, and treat in sequence, everything they introduce. (Examples of analyzed paragraphs are appended.) (AEA) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 20490101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies 
650 1 7 |a Communication Problems.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Discourse Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Language Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Language Styles.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Rhetoric.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Rhetorical Criticism.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Sentence Structure.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Structural Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b62780372  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-12-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-12-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i e6768af8-f770-5eaa-8e5d-5f8504aa79df  |s 5f521bbc-a2a2-5eb6-b31a-f931aa766a61 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED176300  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1