CBTE And Teacher Education Governance [microform] / Sue Marks and Others.

This study examined institutional analysis reports of sixteen teacher education institutions in West Virginia to see how two sections of the state standards affected the governance of the institutions. The standards required that: (1) the institutions provide an organizational structure that ensures...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Marks, Sue
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1981.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6294048
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 810216s1981 xx |||| b ||| s eng d
005 20240722190652.6
035 |a (ERIC)ed201627 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED201627 
100 1 |a Marks, Sue. 
245 1 0 |a CBTE And Teacher Education Governance  |h [microform] /  |c Sue Marks and Others. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1981. 
300 |a 20 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators (Dallas, TX, February 16, 1981).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED201627. 
520 |a This study examined institutional analysis reports of sixteen teacher education institutions in West Virginia to see how two sections of the state standards affected the governance of the institutions. The standards required that: (1) the institutions provide an organizational structure that ensures cooperative program planning in all disciplines; and (2) the institutions maintain a standing policy-recommending body for program planning and evaluation. The standing body should be representative of public school personnel, college faculty, teacher education students, and professional educators. Among the findings were: (1) All of the institutions reported the existence of a standing body, although variations in scope of representation, size, means of selection, and frequency of meetings were evident; (2) Not all of the institutions complied with the requirement that the standing body make policy recommendations or have program planning or evaluation responsibilities; and (3) The standing bodies functioned at various stages of planning, from initiating and deliberating to implementing. It can be concluded that, although the standards have imposed restrictions, diversity and freedom still exist in the institutions. (FG) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 20490101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies 
650 0 7 |a Accreditation (Institutions)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a College Governing Councils.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a College Planning.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Compliance (Legal)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Governance.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Institutional Characteristics.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Policy Formation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Schools of Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a State Standards.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b6294048x  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-13-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-14-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 24437743-67cd-53b5-beb5-2cd08c4ad45d  |s decd1135-a838-5bbe-bfc2-e5a027fec21c 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED201627  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1