Affective Implications of Metaphor and Simile in Discourse. Technical Report No. 301 [electronic resource] / David S. Miall and Richard J. Vondruska.

Differences between metaphors and similes have often been overlooked in the experimental literature, and the comparison theory addressing comprehension of simile may be less appropriate to the more transformational properties of metaphor. It is proposed that one of the variables associated with the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Miall, David S.
Corporate Authors: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Center for the Study of Reading, Bolt, Beranek, and Newman
Other Authors: Vondruska, Richard J.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1983.
Subjects:
Description
Summary:Differences between metaphors and similes have often been overlooked in the experimental literature, and the comparison theory addressing comprehension of simile may be less appropriate to the more transformational properties of metaphor. It is proposed that one of the variables associated with the difference is affective response, leading to the hypothesis that the metaphor's greater power to unsettle a subject's view will be accompanied by a higher incidence of affective responses. A first test of this hypothesis was made using 54 fourth and fifth grade children and 70 college students. The data from the children were in agreement with the hypothesis--they generated a higher frequency of affective responses to metaphors than to similes. The adult data, however, were inconclusive, showing a slight trend in the opposite direction. A second experiment with 33 college students investigated the degree of affective shift in response to metaphors, similes, or literal paraphrases in a story. Results showed greater affective shift in the simile condition than in either the metaphor or literal conditions. The findings suggest that, in contrast to children, depth of affective processing rather than frequency of affective ideas may be a key factor in adult figurative response. (Author/FL)
Item Description:ERIC Document Number: ED237953.
Sponsoring Agency: National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC.
Contract Number: 400-81-0030.
Also distributed on microfiche by U.S. GPO under ED 1.310/2:237953.
Physical Description:31 p.
Audience:Researchers.