Cartoonists and Editors Look at Cartooning [electronic resource] / Daniel Riffe and Others.

Questionnaires were completed by 96 editorial cartoonists and by 67 of their newspaper editors in a study of the journalistic autonomy and decision making participation of the cartoonist. It was hypothesized that (1) editors and cartoonists would agree on the cartoonist's role, and (2) cartooni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Riffe, Daniel
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1984.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6316030
003 CoU
005 20080221101701.6
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 840801s1984 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed245245 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED245245 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED245245 
100 1 |a Riffe, Daniel. 
245 1 0 |a Cartoonists and Editors Look at Cartooning  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Daniel Riffe and Others. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1984. 
300 |a 26 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED245245. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (67th, Gainesville, FL, August 5-8, 1984).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Questionnaires were completed by 96 editorial cartoonists and by 67 of their newspaper editors in a study of the journalistic autonomy and decision making participation of the cartoonist. It was hypothesized that (1) editors and cartoonists would agree on the cartoonist's role, and (2) cartoonists and their editors would differ significantly in their view on several specific autonomy factors, such as quotas, freedom from editorial constraints, and decision making processes. As predicted, cartoonists' descriptions of their role agreed with the editors' descriptions of the cartoonists' role (i.e., as critic, artist, entertainer, reporter, etc.). However, there was a contrast between how cartoonists thought the editors perceived the role and how the editors in fact perceived it. The cartoonists were more likely to use two different roles when describing their perceptions and their editors' perceptions, while the editors were more likely to use the same role to describe their own view and what they thought the cartoonist's view was. concerned the statement that cartoonists should be free from all editoral restraints. Most editors disagreed strongly. The two samples agreed that the cartoons published did reflect the paper's editorial policy. Both groups gave similar rankings to sources of ideas for cartoons, and both agreed on the importance of a quota in the production of good cartoons. More cartoonists believed, however, that the number of cartoons they were submitting was excessive, while none of the editors believed the quotas were excessive. (HTH) 
650 1 7 |a Cartoons.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Decision Making.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Editing.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Editorials.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Employee Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Employer Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Employer Employee Relationship.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Journalism.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Media Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Newspapers.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Organizational Communication.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Role Perception.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED245245.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63160304  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-13-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i d935db85-579c-56ab-b4f6-434e3b1c92c4  |s 5201f74c-696d-5da3-ab13-9f3d3de66d85 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED245245  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1