Statement of the Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division before The Federalist Society Symposium on Equality and the Law [electronic resource] / Wm. Bradford Reynolds.

Comparable worth is a concept not merely alien but also inferior to the traditions of the American people. The thesis that jobs of "comparable worth" demand pay equivalency--at least as between male-dominated and female-dominated occupations--is unworthy of serious attention in both legal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Reynolds, Wm. Bradford
Corporate Author: United States. Department of Justice. Civil Rights Division, Washington, DC. Civil Rights Div
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1985.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6319889
003 CoU
005 20080221101452.4
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 850302s1985 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed254595 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED254595 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED254595 
100 1 |a Reynolds, Wm. Bradford. 
245 1 0 |a Statement of the Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division before The Federalist Society Symposium on Equality and the Law  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Wm. Bradford Reynolds. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1985. 
300 |a 12 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED254595. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Statement made at Georgetown University Law Center (Washington, DC, March 2, 1985).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Comparable worth is a concept not merely alien but also inferior to the traditions of the American people. The thesis that jobs of "comparable worth" demand pay equivalency--at least as between male-dominated and female-dominated occupations--is unworthy of serious attention in both legal and economic terms. The consequences of accepting in the United States a system of compensation based on comparable worth would all be bad. The main criticisms of comparable worth are: (1) it is concerned neither with employment discrimination nor compensation discrimination but with the redistribution of wealth along gender lines; (2) it is difficult to determine how one would ascertain whether a certain job was comparable in value to another; (3) in an open economy individual compensation is determined not by the intrinsic societal value of the job but by the marketplace factors of supply and demand; (4) the wage gap between genders can be explained by factors other than gender-based discrimination; (5) as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires only a showing of intentional discrimination, the demands of comparable worth go far beyond Federal civil rights legislation; and (6) comparable worth would increase taxes, require expensive administration, and increase unemployment. (RDN) 
650 0 7 |a Affirmative Action.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Civil Rights.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Employment Practices.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Equal Opportunities (Jobs)  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Labor Market.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Salary Wage Differentials.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Sex Discrimination.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Sex Fairness.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Social Bias.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 1 |a United States.  |b Department of Justice.  |b Civil Rights Division, Washington, DC. Civil Rights Div. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED254595.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63198897  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-13-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 1138c8de-1b75-539d-ae1c-38b0715a15e9  |s 3b76a76d-edc0-5741-831c-81a001b1df6b 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED254595  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1