Educational Quality and Family Choice [electronic resource] : Toward a Statewide Public School Voucher Plan / Denis P. Doyle and Chester E. Finn, Jr.

A model is proposed for enhancing family choice in public education; unlike many previous voucher plans, it would build on current trends in educational administration. Following an introduction that reviews these trends--highlighting recent developments in California school finance--two central ass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Doyle, Denis P.
Other Authors: Finn, Chester E., Jr., 1944-
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1983.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6320052
003 CoU
005 20080221101600.2
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 831115s1983 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed254898 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED254898 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED254898 
100 1 |a Doyle, Denis P. 
245 1 0 |a Educational Quality and Family Choice  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Toward a Statewide Public School Voucher Plan /  |c Denis P. Doyle and Chester E. Finn, Jr. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1983. 
300 |a 29 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED254898. 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Also distributed on microfiche by U.S. GPO under ED 1.310/2:254898. 
520 |a A model is proposed for enhancing family choice in public education; unlike many previous voucher plans, it would build on current trends in educational administration. Following an introduction that reviews these trends--highlighting recent developments in California school finance--two central assumptions are stated: that regulated competition will provide better education than centralized bureaucracy; and that with the current reform movement focusing on the state level, local school boards are becoming obsolete intermediaries. The voucher plan presented in accord with these assumptions includes the following components: (1) weighted vouchers to encourage schools to accept disadvantaged students; (2) parent-elected, state-regulated boards of trustees to govern schools; (3) standardized formats for school publicity; (4) voluntary purchasing from regional service centers; (5) participation open to all schools conforming to state regulations; (6) freedom (within constitutional limits) for each school to set academic and disciplinary standards; (7) transportation vouchers; (8) some public boarding schools; and (9) community option to retain a traditional school district. Brief observations on the model's implications for tax allocation, collective bargaining, and the teaching profession complete the paper. (MCG) 
521 8 |a Policymakers.  |b ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Access to Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Admission Criteria.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Disadvantaged Youth.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Educational Change.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Finance.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Educational Vouchers.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Secondary Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Eligibility.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Full State Funding.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Government School Relationship.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Models.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a School Choice.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a School Organization.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a State Standards.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Finn, Chester E.,  |c Jr.,  |d 1944- 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED254898.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63200521  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-13-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 41a39cfc-fc57-5f5d-8f63-a035f29e2e42  |s 6c7974b7-b391-5a5b-a47e-3a7994ed97f8 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED254898  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1