Gifted and Talented Needs Assessment. Evaluation Report, 1986-87 [electronic resource]

A needs assessment of the Saginaw (MI) Public Schools Gifted and Talented Program (grades K-12) gathered information from gifted and talented professional staff (administrators, teachers, and counselors), secondary students, and parents. A total of 481 out of 1004 possible respondents returned the s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Corporate Author: School District of the City of Saginaw. Department of Evaluation, Testing, and Research
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1987.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6335737
003 CoU
005 20080221101520.8
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 870601s1987 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed290317 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED290317 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED290317 
110 1 |a School District of the City of Saginaw.  |b Department of Evaluation, Testing, and Research. 
245 1 0 |a Gifted and Talented Needs Assessment. Evaluation Report, 1986-87  |h [electronic resource] 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1987. 
300 |a 222 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED290317. 
520 |a A needs assessment of the Saginaw (MI) Public Schools Gifted and Talented Program (grades K-12) gathered information from gifted and talented professional staff (administrators, teachers, and counselors), secondary students, and parents. A total of 481 out of 1004 possible respondents returned the survey, with a lower than hoped for rate among elementary and secondary parents (29 and 22 percent respectively). Five functions emerged as the areas of highest need: (1) identification of gifted/talented students; (2) auxiliary support and staff; (3) parental involvement and commitment; (4) staff development; and (5) leadership by principal. One appendix contains a list of all high need functions and should be helpful in translating priorities into action plans for both elementary and secondary gifted and talented programs. Other appendices and tables provide copies of the survey instruments, detailed statistical analyses of the responses from each group, and a profile of return rates for each group. (VW) 
521 8 |a Administrators.  |b ericd. 
521 8 |a Practitioners.  |b ericd. 
521 8 |a Policymakers.  |b ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Administrator Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Administrator Responsibility.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Counselor Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Secondary Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Gifted.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Inservice Teacher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Needs Assessment.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Parent Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Parent Participation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Parent School Relationship.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Professional Development.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Student Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Surveys.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Talent Identification.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED290317.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63357379  |b 01-03-23  |c 10-13-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 4bb25da9-c96e-512a-8995-7c9de5e15ef1  |s f00201b6-ca7a-53ed-9861-23e98b6bbd0f 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED290317  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1