Social Science Discourse [electronic resource] : Issues in Scholarly Communication / Andrew M. Calabrese.

Focusing particularly on communication as a discipline, this paper is a review and synthesis of literature about scholarly communication in the social sciences. Drawing from literature about ferment in the communication discipline, from information science, the sociology of knowledge, and the philos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Calabrese, Andrew M.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1987.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6338377
003 CoU
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 871101s1987 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
005 20230818004109.3
035 |a (ERIC)ed295223 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED295223 
100 1 |a Calabrese, Andrew M. 
245 1 0 |a Social Science Discourse  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Issues in Scholarly Communication /  |c Andrew M. Calabrese. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1987. 
300 |a 22 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED295223. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (73rd, Boston, MA, November 5-8, 1987).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Focusing particularly on communication as a discipline, this paper is a review and synthesis of literature about scholarly communication in the social sciences. Drawing from literature about ferment in the communication discipline, from information science, the sociology of knowledge, and the philosophy of social science, the paper argues that social theories do not and need not fall within disciplinary boundaries. The paper observes that many of the reasons why disciplines come to be defined as they do is more related to historical accident than to conceptual rigor. Institutional inertia exerts a powerful restraint against interdisciplinary social research through the maintenance of academic departments, associations and journals and the reward structures they impose. However, the mere fact of the existence of these forces is not a conceptually defensible basis for discouraging interdisciplinary research. The paper also argues that the ubiquity of human communication demands a theoretical perspective that is not subject to rigid boundaries of specialization. The felt need to develop a paradigm of communication is evidenced in the recent literature about intellectual ferment among communication scholars. The paper notes that communication theory has begun to be equated with social theory in general through the work of scholars such as Habermas. In that light, human communication can be seen as a central element in all social research. This is a unique feature that sets communication apart as an interdisciplinary "discipline." (A four-page bibliography and 15 notes are attached.) (Author/JK) 
650 1 7 |a Communication Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Communication (Thought Transfer)  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Humanities.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Intellectual Disciplines.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Interdisciplinary Approach.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Social Sciences.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Social Theories.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Theory Practice Relationship.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED295223.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63383779  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-13-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i ec8f8ab5-3abb-5cc9-a9c7-61a1b7798a14  |s 45ecfd12-bf6d-5706-95ce-6c3216ae06d7 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED295223  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1