Deselection : A Novel Approach to the Peering Process. AIR 1988 Annual Forum Paper / Paul B. Duby.

A salary study was conducted employing a national peer group because of the expiration of a faculty contract in 1987. The problem addressed was the way in which to produce this national peer group and the resulting salary database in such a fashion that it would be accepted and utilized by both facu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Duby, Paul B.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1988.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6340382
003 CoU
005 20210609114144.7
006 m o d f
007 cr |||||||||||
008 880501s1988 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed298873 
035 |a (MvI) 1C000000291740 
040 |a ericd  |b eng  |c MvI  |d MvI 
099 |a ED298873 
100 1 |a Duby, Paul B. 
245 1 0 |a Deselection :  |b A Novel Approach to the Peering Process. AIR 1988 Annual Forum Paper /  |c Paul B. Duby. 
264 1 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1988. 
300 |a 54 pages. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |b h  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |b he  |2 rdacarrier. 
520 |a A salary study was conducted employing a national peer group because of the expiration of a faculty contract in 1987. The problem addressed was the way in which to produce this national peer group and the resulting salary database in such a fashion that it would be accepted and utilized by both faculty and administrators involved in the collective bargaining process. A national database was built in LOTUS 1-2-3 containing information on secondary enrollment, revenue, and other institutional characteristics. A joint faculty-administrative advisory committee eventually negotiated the selection of five key data elements. Institutions not possessing these characteristics were "deselected." The remaining 44 schools became the agreed-upon database for the national faculty salary survey. Appended are a number of tables summarizing the data analysis, the final selection criteria, the survey population, and a list of participating institutions. Contains 3 references. (Author/KM) 
650 0 7 |a Collective Bargaining.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a College Faculty.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Contract Salaries.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Data Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Databases.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Institutional Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Peer Groups.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Peer Institutions.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Salaries.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED298873.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63403821  |b 11-24-21  |c 10-14-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 1aa22eb5-3cf0-59cb-87a5-c495c6ae1a00  |s d19dbf44-3645-5b3d-b645-6d9138d553b3 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED298873  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1