Understanding Students' Beliefs about Probability [electronic resource] / Clifford Konold.

The concept of probability is not an easy concept for high school and college students to understand. This paper identifies and analyzes the students' alternative frameworks from the viewpoint of constructivism. There are various interpretations of probability through mathematical history: clas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Konold, Clifford
Corporate Author: Scientific Reasoning Research Institute
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1988.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6342713
003 CoU
005 20080221101529.5
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 880601s1988 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed303358 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
088 |a SRRI-192 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED303358 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED303358 
100 1 |a Konold, Clifford. 
245 1 0 |a Understanding Students' Beliefs about Probability  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Clifford Konold. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1988. 
300 |a 30 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED303358. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Some pages contain light type.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a The concept of probability is not an easy concept for high school and college students to understand. This paper identifies and analyzes the students' alternative frameworks from the viewpoint of constructivism. There are various interpretations of probability through mathematical history: classical, frequentist, and subjectivist interpretation. These interpretations provide a context for evaluating various beliefs about probability held by students long before the start of formal instruction. The study develops an outcome approach model of informal reasoning under certainty and presents a few excerpts from conversations with students about probability to demonstrate how statements can be understood according to the outcome approach. Three kinds of students' reasoning statements are discussed: confusing statements, statements that sound incorrect, and statements which contain two conflicting views. This study suggests three general types of criteria against which students are encouraged to evaluate their current beliefs. These are the fit between their beliefs and: (1) the beliefs of others; (2) their other, related beliefs; and (3) empirical observations. (YP) 
521 8 |a Researchers.  |b ericd. 
521 8 |a Teachers.  |b ericd. 
521 8 |a Practitioners.  |b ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Cognitive Processes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Cognitive Structures.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a College Mathematics.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Concept Formation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a High Schools.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a History.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Mathematical Concepts.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Mathematics Instruction.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Misconceptions.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Probability.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Schemata (Cognition)  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Secondary School Mathematics.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Statistics.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a Scientific Reasoning Research Institute. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED303358.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63427138  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-14-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i adc6f3e7-25e7-54ee-ad5c-358976deb39f  |s a4f1b36b-5e1b-5f6c-bb38-2dcba6c26309 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED303358  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1