Computer-Assisted Writing Skill Assessment Using WordMAP (TM) [electronic resource] / Hunter M. Breland and Eldon G. Lytle.

The utility of computer analysis in the assessment of written products was studied using the WordMAP software package. Data were collected for 92 college freshmen, using: (1) the Test of Standard Written English (TSWE); (2) the English Composition Test of the College Board; (3) verbal and mathematic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Breland, Hunter M.
Other Authors: Lytle, Eldon G.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1990.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6350390
003 CoU
005 20080306155045.6
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 900401s1990 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed317586 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED317586 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED317586 
100 1 |a Breland, Hunter M. 
245 1 0 |a Computer-Assisted Writing Skill Assessment Using WordMAP (TM)  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Hunter M. Breland and Eldon G. Lytle. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1990. 
300 |a 19 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED317586. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Association (Boston, MA, April 16-20, 1990) and the National Council on Measurement in Education (Boston, MA, April 17-19, 1990).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
520 |a The utility of computer analysis in the assessment of written products was studied using the WordMAP software package. Data were collected for 92 college freshmen, using: (1) the Test of Standard Written English (TSWE); (2) the English Composition Test of the College Board; (3) verbal and mathematical Scholastic Aptitude Tests; (4) two narrative essays; (5) two expository essays; and (6) two persuasive essays. The variables analyzed by WordMAP were used to predict the score on a single essay and a combined score for the other five essays that three human readers would give. In either situation, the computer could predict the reader's score reasonably well. It is not likely that many institutions will choose to assess writing without using human readers, but the fact that assessment of writing skills can be enhanced through software analysis may make it possible to reduce the amount of labor required, perhaps by using only one reader instead of the two or three usually required. Computer analysis also makes possible a level of feedback to students and teachers that is not possible using human readers alone. Five tables contain data from the study. (SLD) 
650 1 7 |a College Freshmen.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Computer Assisted Testing.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Assessment.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Essay Tests.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Holistic Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Predictive Measurement.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Writing Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Writing Skills.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Lytle, Eldon G. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED317586.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63503906  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-14-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 9559a1b5-6fd5-51d0-abc3-da59e1b12fe9  |s fe9873c9-226b-5baa-b2f4-f0c47a598810 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED317586  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1