Milliken, Governor of Michigan et al. v. Bradley et al. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit [electronic resource] : Syllabus. Slip Opinion.

In this Supreme Court litigation, respondents brought a class action alleging that the Detroit public school system is racially segregated as a result of the official policies and actions of petitioner state and city officials and seeking implementation of a plan to eliminate the segregation and est...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Corporate Author: Supreme Court of the U. S., Washington, DC
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1974.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6365747
003 CoU
005 20081118081444.8
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 740725s1974 xx |||| og ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed131177 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED131177 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED131177 
110 2 |a Supreme Court of the U. S., Washington, DC. 
245 1 0 |a Milliken, Governor of Michigan et al. v. Bradley et al. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Syllabus. Slip Opinion. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1974. 
300 |a 104 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED131177. 
520 |a In this Supreme Court litigation, respondents brought a class action alleging that the Detroit public school system is racially segregated as a result of the official policies and actions of petitioner state and city officials and seeking implementation of a plan to eliminate the segregation and establish a unitary nonracial school system. The District Court ruled that it was proper to consider metropolitan areas, and that it would seek a solution beyond the limitations of the Detroit school district to accomplish its racial integration. On July 25, 1974, the Supreme Court held that the relief ordered by the District Court and affirmed by the Court of Appeals was based on erroneous standards. A Federal court may not impose a multidistrict, area wide remedy for single-district de jure school segregation violations, where there is no finding that the other included school districts have failed to operate unitary school systems or have committed acts that effected segregation within the other districts, and there is no claim of finding that the school district boundary lines established with the purpose of fostering racial segregation, and where there is no meaningful opportunity for the included neighboring school districts to present evidence or be heard on the propriety of a multidistrict remedy or on the question of constitutional violations by those districts. (Author/JM) 
650 0 7 |a Court Litigation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a De Facto Segregation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a De Jure Segregation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Desegregation Litigation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Desegregation Plans.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Federal Courts.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Legal Responsibility.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Metropolitan Areas.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Public Schools.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Racial Integration.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Racial Segregation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a School Desegregation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a School Districts.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Supreme Court Litigation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Urban Schools.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a Supreme Court of the U. S., Washington, DC. 
856 4 0 |z Full Text (via ERIC)  |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED131177.pdf 
907 |a .b63657478  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-15-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i c5aae4f8-8fef-59b2-b71a-6d2636b312be  |s 68e9161c-70bb-5219-91c8-9cc4e0cf8f2a 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED131177  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1