Peripheral Visual Processing [electronic resource] / Deborah Lott Holmes and Others.

This study examined the hypothesis that the effective visual field of 5-year-old children is smaller than that of 8-year-old children and adults. In addition, an effort was made to determine whether task demands affect the size of the effective visual field and if so, whether the effects on performa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Holmes, Deborah Lott
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1977.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6375473
003 CoU
005 20081118081507.5
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 770301s1977 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed142318 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED142318 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED142318 
100 1 |a Holmes, Deborah Lott. 
245 1 0 |a Peripheral Visual Processing  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Deborah Lott Holmes and Others. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1977. 
300 |a 11 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED142318. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (New Orleans, Louisiana, March 17-20, 1977).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a This study examined the hypothesis that the effective visual field of 5-year-old children is smaller than that of 8-year-old children and adults. In addition, an effort was made to determine whether task demands affect the size of the effective visual field and if so, whether the effects on performance are different for children and adults. A total of 54 subjects in three age groups (5-year-olds, 8-year-olds, and college adults) participated in one of three experimental conditions: (1) identification of a single geometric form located peripherally, (2) identification of a peripheral form presented simultaneously with a foveally located form which was to be ignored, and (3) identification of a peripheral form presented with a foveally located form, both of which were to be reported. The findings showed that a subject's ability to identify peripherally presented stimulus items was impaired by the presence of a foveally presented item whether or not the item required processing. Results also suggest that this interference by the foveal item was due to the tendency of older subjects to process this foveal item first. This tendency is apparently learned as it is not present in 5-year-old children. (JMB) 
650 1 7 |a Adults.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Age Differences.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Children.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Vision.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Visual Perception.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Visual Stimuli.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |z Full Text (via ERIC)  |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED142318.pdf 
907 |a .b63754733  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-15-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 7214c985-78ad-5f46-bc91-7648ff5cd9e0  |s 132a966d-53d5-5c6c-b469-3323a894bd98 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED142318  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1