Faculty Development Survey. Final Report [electronic resource] / Hilliard Jason and Others.

A national survey was designed to obtain information in four principal areas of concern: (1) what preparation medical faculty members had for their roles as teachers; (2) instructional practices of medical faculty; (3) where faculty are experiencing difficulties in teaching; and (4) in what areas th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Jason, Hilliard
Corporate Author: Association of American Medical Colleges
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1977.
Subjects:
Description
Summary:A national survey was designed to obtain information in four principal areas of concern: (1) what preparation medical faculty members had for their roles as teachers; (2) instructional practices of medical faculty; (3) where faculty are experiencing difficulties in teaching; and (4) in what areas they are interested in receiving help. A stratified random sampling of 2,700 faculty (representing over 28,000 full-time medical school faculty members) was used for the survey. Findings show that: (1) faculty have had little formal preparation for their teaching roles, with only 21 percent having taken education courses and 39 percent having attended an educational workshop; (2) faculty make considerably more use of traditional than innovative teaching techniques such as lecturing; (3) faculty are not thorough in their management of the instructional process; and (4) they express interest in improving their teaching by reading and attending educational workshops, especially in the area of instructional evaluation. (Author/MSE)
Item Description:ERIC Document Number: ED148265.
Availability: Association of American Medical Colleges, One Dupont Circle, Suite 200, Washington, D.C. 20036.
Sponsoring Agency: Health Resources Administration (DHEW/PHS), Bethesda, MD. Bureau of Health Manpower.
Contract Number: 231-76-0011.
ERIC Note: Parts of document may be marginally legible due to quality of print.
Physical Description:189 p.