The Systematic Observation of Lecturing [electronic resource] : Its Use in Training and Research / Ray McAleese.

A seminar is described in which systematic observation techniques were applied to lecturer training to make the supervisory element in microteaching more objective. The system provided a highly structured technique that the lecturers could use to systematise their discussion of microlectures or real...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: McAleese, Ray
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1973.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6377335
003 CoU
005 20080306155039.1
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 730901s1973 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed148325 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED148325 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED148325 
100 1 |a McAleese, Ray. 
245 1 4 |a The Systematic Observation of Lecturing  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Its Use in Training and Research /  |c Ray McAleese. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1973. 
300 |a 19 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED148325. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at a seminar on Classroom Research at the University of Leicester (Leicester, England, September 26-28, 1973); For related documents, see IR 005 366 and 369.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a A seminar is described in which systematic observation techniques were applied to lecturer training to make the supervisory element in microteaching more objective. The system provided a highly structured technique that the lecturers could use to systematise their discussion of microlectures or real lectures, either recorded on tape or live. Three parameters were "observed": non-verbal, verbal, and content aspects of lecturing. These categories were used after the trainees learned the system and could reliably code a lecture into these components. This information was then used by the trainer and trainee as data in analyzing a lecture. A small scale study is reported in which the attitude of the trainees to each of four treatments (systematic observation vs. conventional feedback and audio vs. closed circuit television augmented feedback) was measured. No significant difference was found between groups. A discussion of the reliability and validity of the system is appended. (DAG) 
650 0 7 |a Classroom Observation Techniques.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Closed Circuit Television.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Content Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Lesson Observation Criteria.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Microteaching.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Self Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Behavior.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Universities.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |z Full Text (via ERIC)  |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED148325.pdf 
907 |a .b63773351  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-15-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 4  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i e3d49021-b917-5547-b4df-32900afc9ace  |s 41077dad-20e4-5d9d-8335-07d0bf160611 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED148325  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1