Interpreting Metaphors and Idioms : Some Effects of Context on Comprehension. Technical Report No. 93 / Andrew Ortony and Others.

Two experiments are described in which reaction times for understanding target sentences or phrases in terms of a preceding context were measured. In experiment one, the target sentences followed either short or long contexts which induced either literal interpretations or metaphorical ones. Results...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Ortony, Andrew
Corporate Authors: Illinois Univ., Urbana. Center for the Study of Reading, Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, MA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Center for the Study of Reading, Bolt, Beranek, and Newman
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1978.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6379863
003 CoU
005 20210316162346.9
006 m o d f
007 cr |||||||||||
008 780701s1978 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed157042 
035 |a (MvI) 5P000000149935 
040 |a ericd  |b eng  |c MvI  |d MvI 
099 |a ED157042 
100 1 |a Ortony, Andrew. 
245 1 0 |a Interpreting Metaphors and Idioms :  |b Some Effects of Context on Comprehension. Technical Report No. 93 /  |c Andrew Ortony and Others. 
264 1 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1978. 
300 |a 41 pages. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |b h  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |b he  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: National Inst. of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: National Academy of Education, Washington, DC.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Two experiments are described in which reaction times for understanding target sentences or phrases in terms of a preceding context were measured. In experiment one, the target sentences followed either short or long contexts which induced either literal interpretations or metaphorical ones. Results indicated that only in the short context condition did subjects take significantly longer to understand metaphorical than literal targets. This interaction is explained in terms of the availability of appropriate schemata for interpreting the target. In experiment two, targets were phrases that could be given either an idiomatic or a literal interpretation. It was found that the comprehension of phrases receiving an idiomatic interpretation took no longer than the comprehension of those same phrases when given a literal interpretation, and there was some evidence that idiomatic interpretations were consistently faster. It is argued that both experiments can be accounted for in terms of contextually generated expectations. The processes required for the comprehension of figurative and literal uses of language seem to be essentially similar. (Author) 
650 0 7 |a College Students.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Context Clues.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Figurative Language.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Metaphors.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reaction Time.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Comprehension.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Processes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Research.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a Illinois Univ., Urbana. Center for the Study of Reading. 
710 2 |a Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, MA. 
710 2 |a University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.  |b Center for the Study of Reading. 
710 2 |a Bolt, Beranek, and Newman. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED157042.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b63798633  |b 11-24-21  |c 10-15-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i c2b52a02-a1a1-565a-b219-a6a93e150ff2  |s 5e850b7a-7cee-51c6-962b-0a505cd1db42 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED157042  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1