Controlling Student Behavior Problems [electronic resource] : What Are the Alternatives? / Daniel Linden Duke.

Educators who confront problems of dysfunctional student behavior may select from a variety of control procedures, representing six basic strategies. Evidence is drawn from decision theory to support the contention that the likelihood of selecting effective control procedures is enhanced by a thorou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Duke, Daniel Linden
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1979.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6384961
003 CoU
005 20080306155040.0
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 790101s1979 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed173714 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED173714 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED173714 
100 1 |a Duke, Daniel Linden. 
245 1 0 |a Controlling Student Behavior Problems  |h [electronic resource] :  |b What Are the Alternatives? /  |c Daniel Linden Duke. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1979. 
300 |a 43 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED173714. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco, California, April 8-12, 1979).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Elementary Secondary Education. 
520 |a Educators who confront problems of dysfunctional student behavior may select from a variety of control procedures, representing six basic strategies. Evidence is drawn from decision theory to support the contention that the likelihood of selecting effective control procedures is enhanced by a thorough examination of as many alternative procedures as possible. Case studies of three schools indicate that school personnel, for various reasons, may not always base their choices of control procedures on such thorough examinations. Procedures seem to be adopted, at least in two of the three schools, as a result of informal, unsystematic processes. They tend to be poorly coordinated and, on occasion, serve to undermine each other's effectiveness. Encouragement of more systematic decision making may depend ultimately on certain key organizational changes, including the provision of more time for decision making and the creation of incentives for those who participate. Reducing the size of the unit engaged in decision making also may lead to improved decisions. Thus, school structure first may need to be altered before substantial reductions in student behavior problems can be expected. (Author) 
650 1 7 |a Behavior Problems.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Communication Skills.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Curriculum Development.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Decision Making.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Secondary Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Environmental Influences.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Organizational Change.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Problem Solving.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a School Personnel.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Student Behavior.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |z Full Text (via ERIC)  |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED173714.pdf 
907 |a .b63849616  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-15-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 1bac56e1-c86b-5159-9524-ec97bd9a8603  |s 806bdd9f-cec0-5217-b082-eb58f46605bc 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED173714  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1