The Complexities of Evaluating Teachers [electronic resource] / M. Martha Lengeling.
A discussion of teacher evaluation offers a definition and rationale, and explains a few of its traditional forms. Common uses of teacher evaluation for personnel management, accountability, and improvement of teaching are described, and a distinction is made between formative and summative types of...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Full Text (via ERIC) |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[S.l.] :
Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
1996.
|
| Subjects: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000002u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | b6396742 | ||
| 003 | CoU | ||
| 005 | 20080220152138.3 | ||
| 006 | m d f | ||
| 007 | cr un | ||
| 008 | 960101s1996 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (ERIC)ed399822 | ||
| 040 | |a ericd |c ericd |d MvI | ||
| 099 | |f ERIC DOC # |a ED399822 | ||
| 099 | |f ERIC DOC # |a ED399822 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lengeling, M. Martha. | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Complexities of Evaluating Teachers |h [electronic resource] / |c M. Martha Lengeling. |
| 260 | |a [S.l.] : |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, |c 1996. | ||
| 300 | |a 13 p. | ||
| 500 | |a ERIC Document Number: ED399822. | ||
| 520 | |a A discussion of teacher evaluation offers a definition and rationale, and explains a few of its traditional forms. Common uses of teacher evaluation for personnel management, accountability, and improvement of teaching are described, and a distinction is made between formative and summative types of evaluation. Teacher evaluation, often based on observation with little discussion, and student ratings, often provided in the last few minutes of a class, may both gather useful information but may be more useful when combined. Tension between teachers and administration may also affect evaluation, sometimes alienating one or both parties. Traditional methods of teacher evaluation include classroom observation, peer observation, self-evaluation, and student ratings. The last of these has grown in popularity, but can be abused and have potential for bias or inadequacy. Increasingly, portfolios are used to document teaching skills and strengths, use of materials, professional growth, and reflections on teaching. It is concluded that no single method is adequate to evaluate a teacher, and that a holistic method is needed. Contains 15 reference. (MSE) | ||
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Classroom Observation Techniques. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Classroom Techniques. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Elementary Secondary Education. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Evaluation Criteria. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Evaluation Methods. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Faculty Evaluation. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Faculty Promotion. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Feedback. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Foreign Countries. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Formative Evaluation. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Higher Education. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Instructional Improvement. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Peer Evaluation. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Portfolios (Background Materials) |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Self Evaluation (Individuals) |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Summative Evaluation. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Teacher Education. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Teacher Evaluation. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Teacher Promotion. |2 ericd. |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED399822.pdf |z Full Text (via ERIC) |
| 907 | |a .b6396742x |b 07-06-22 |c 10-16-10 | ||
| 998 | |a web |b 10-26-12 |c f |d m |e - |f eng |g xx |h 4 |i 1 | ||
| 956 | |a ERIC | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i 33658e51-b3c8-53fb-b136-b04d32dd218a |s 68eb6095-010d-5a81-8181-580338aa7044 |
| 952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Online |c Online |d Online |e ED399822 |h Other scheme |i web |n 1 |