An Analysis of Multiple-Choice Test Item Booklets [electronic resource] / William E. Herman.

Marks made by students on test item booklets were analyzed as a clue to better understanding of the metacognitive strategies employed during the completion of a 100-question multiple-choice final examination. Test item booklets of 56 undergraduates were scrutinized for the frequency of the following...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Herman, William E.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1996.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6400225
003 CoU
005 20080220152131.7
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 960801s1996 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed404357 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED404357 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED404357 
100 1 |a Herman, William E. 
245 1 3 |a An Analysis of Multiple-Choice Test Item Booklets  |h [electronic resource] /  |c William E. Herman. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1996. 
300 |a 15 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED404357. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association (104th, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August 9-13, 1996).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Marks made by students on test item booklets were analyzed as a clue to better understanding of the metacognitive strategies employed during the completion of a 100-question multiple-choice final examination. Test item booklets of 56 undergraduates were scrutinized for the frequency of the following item markings; (1) no markings at all; (2) elaborations, which consisted of definitions, examples, etc.; (3) use of a "?" next to items; and (4) option elimination techniques involving marking out alternatives. All subjects marked at least one item on the examination, and overall 58% of the items were marked. Examination performance was found to be related to all marking variables as predicted, although only the lack of item marking relationship was found to be statistically significant. The results suggest that such item markings may be an important artifact of the test taking experience that can lead to better understanding of examination strategies and the overall test taking experience. (Contains two tables and seven references.) (Author/SLD) 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Metacognition.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Multiple Choice Tests.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Responses.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Test Items.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Test Results.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Testing.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Undergraduate Students.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED404357.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64002251  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-16-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-25-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 3  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 7641ea2e-3311-5f27-b311-07f9808639ff  |s 85c886a0-0538-5cae-be6d-aed537c37300 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED404357  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1