Differential Item Functioning [electronic resource] : An Applied Comparison of the Item Characteristic Curve Method with the Logistic Discriminant Function Method / Nancy Holweger and Timothy Weston.

This study compares logistic discriminant function analysis for differential item functioning (DIF) with a technique for the detection of DIF that is based on item response theory rather than the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In this study, the areas between the two item characteristic curves, also cal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Holweger, Nancy
Corporate Author: University of Colorado Boulder
Other Authors: Weston, Timothy
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1998.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6413914
003 CoU
005 20080220152242.6
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 980101s1998 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed422362 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |a ERIC DOC #  |a ED422362 
099 |a ERIC DOC #  |a ED422362 
100 1 |a Holweger, Nancy. 
245 1 0 |a Differential Item Functioning  |h [electronic resource] :  |b An Applied Comparison of the Item Characteristic Curve Method with the Logistic Discriminant Function Method /  |c Nancy Holweger and Timothy Weston. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1998. 
300 |a 43 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED422362. 
520 |a This study compares logistic discriminant function analysis for differential item functioning (DIF) with a technique for the detection of DIF that is based on item response theory rather than the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In this study, the areas between the two item characteristic curves, also called the item characteristic curve method is compared with the logistic discriminant function analysis method for each item and the entire test. Data from a state-level performance-based assessment program for approximately 16,000 examinees are used. Substantial differences are found between the items identified as having DIF using the item characteristic curve method and the logistic discriminant function method. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed. Since a clear determination about the best method to determine DIF is not apparent, manufactured data should be used in a Monte Carlo study to eliminate design aspects of the assessment that confused these results. Appendixes contain plots of item characteristic curves and illustrative figures. (Contains 7 plots, 7 figures, and 13 references.)(SLD) 
650 1 7 |a Item Bias.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Item Response Theory.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Performance Based Assessment.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a State Programs.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Test Items.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Testing Programs.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Weston, Timothy. 
710 2 |a University of Colorado Boulder. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED422362.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64139141  |b 05-10-23  |c 10-16-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-25-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 94f30eb4-ad90-594d-aa6c-77d98e91e95a  |s 12340552-4776-5dac-aabc-12aef93df2ed 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ERIC DOC # ED422362  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1