Finance Reform in Vermont [electronic resource] : The Legislature Responds to the Brigham Supreme Court Decision / William J. Mathis.

In Brigham et al. v. State of Vermont (1997), the Vermont Supreme Court struck down the previous state-funding system and directed the legislature to come up with a new system that would eliminate the inequities among the local school districts. An analysis of this decision and its consequences is o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Mathis, William J.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1998.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6416377
003 CoU
005 20080220152240.6
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 980401s1998 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed425505 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED425505 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED425505 
100 1 |a Mathis, William J. 
245 1 0 |a Finance Reform in Vermont  |h [electronic resource] :  |b The Legislature Responds to the Brigham Supreme Court Decision /  |c William J. Mathis. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1998. 
300 |a 17 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED425505. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Diego, CA, April 13-17, 1998).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a In Brigham et al. v. State of Vermont (1997), the Vermont Supreme Court struck down the previous state-funding system and directed the legislature to come up with a new system that would eliminate the inequities among the local school districts. An analysis of this decision and its consequences is offered here. The paper recaps the funding system prior to 1997 and describes how the previous finance system relied too heavily on local property taxes. As state aid dropped, per pupil expenditures varied widely, ranging from $2,961 to $7,726. This inequity prompted the Brigham case and led to a massive restructuring of educational finance in the form of the Equal Education Opportunities Act. The state drew on a statewide property tax, block grants, an income-sensitive property tax, new taxes, and other programs to fund these financial changes. With the funding in place, the legislature stipulated that local control was the best way to allocate the resources. This emphasis on local control was leavened by a state-curriculum framework, new assessment standards, standardized achievement tests, local goal-setting and action plans, and state standards and yearly progress reports. In the first year of the program, poor towns moderately increased their spending and richer towns cut their budgets, indicators of increasing financial equity. (Contains 15 references.) (RJM) 
650 1 7 |a Educational Equity (Finance)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Educational Finance.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Legislation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Secondary Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Expenditure per Student.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a School District Spending.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a School Funds.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a School Taxes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a State Legislation.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED425505.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64163775  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-16-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-25-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 7ecea2ee-1ff1-5790-8e80-f8e44744fcb3  |s 07076b35-3ccc-5723-b9d0-834012b22eca 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED425505  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1