Comprehension [electronic resource] : Of What the Reader Sees of What the Author Says / Thomas H. Estes and Wayne L. Shebilske.

One of the major assumptions of recent reading research has been that what the reader sees in the text plays as heavily in deteriming comprehension as does what the author says in the text. Although most researchers have tended to infer the reader's contributions by noting the differences betwe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Estes, Thomas H.
Other Authors: Shebilske, Wayne L.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1979.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6432389
003 CoU
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 790101s1979 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
005 20240708150537.4
035 |a (ERIC)ed184100 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED184100 
100 1 |a Estes, Thomas H.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2010000381  |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000076719880 
245 1 0 |a Comprehension  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Of What the Reader Sees of What the Author Says /  |c Thomas H. Estes and Wayne L. Shebilske. 
260 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1979. 
300 |a 14 pages 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED184100. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference (29th, San Antonio, TX, November 29-December 1, 1979).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a One of the major assumptions of recent reading research has been that what the reader sees in the text plays as heavily in deteriming comprehension as does what the author says in the text. Although most researchers have tended to infer the reader's contributions by noting the differences between text structure and recall structures, there have been efforts to develop tools to quantify what the reader sees in the text. These efforts began with attention to a text's formal structure as the reader sees it and to the world knowledge of the reader presumed by the text. Four behavioral measures have been proposed for approaching text as a product of readers' perceptions: having readers mark off "idea units" in the text to determine where and how readers organize texts; rating these idea units as important/unimportant to the author's main points; recording the immediate recalls of what has been read; and rating the importance of propositions ensuing from dependency analyses. Research dependent on these measures has begun, using college students as "expert readers"; and the interrelationships among the data suggest interesting connections between the manner in which students perceive text structure and the structure of their comprehension. (RL) 
650 0 7 |a Content Area Reading.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Discourse Analysis.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Reading Comprehension.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Reading Processes.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Reading Research.  |2 ericd 
650 0 7 |a Research Methodology.  |2 ericd 
650 1 7 |a Structural Analysis (Linguistics)  |2 ericd 
700 1 |a Shebilske, Wayne L. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED184100.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64323894  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-18-10 
944 |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 4d8d660a-ce7b-5bf1-aae4-681c6a604ce0  |s 0116764d-7524-5d48-a925-6a6139d2e098 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED184100  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1