Staff Report on the Federal Trade Commission Investigation of Coaching for Standardized Admission Tests [electronic resource]

Whether coaching for standardized admission tests such as the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) is effective was investigated. The Bureau of Consumer Protection of the Federal Trade Commission evaluated the effectiveness of two commercial coaching schools that offered preparation courses for the SAT. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Corporate Author: United States. Federal Trade Commission
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1981.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6439474
003 CoU
005 20081118081509.7
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 810101s1981 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed204391 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED204391 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED204391 
110 1 |a United States.  |b Federal Trade Commission. 
245 1 0 |a Staff Report on the Federal Trade Commission Investigation of Coaching for Standardized Admission Tests  |h [electronic resource] 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1981. 
300 |a 60 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED204391. 
520 |a Whether coaching for standardized admission tests such as the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) is effective was investigated. The Bureau of Consumer Protection of the Federal Trade Commission evaluated the effectiveness of two commercial coaching schools that offered preparation courses for the SAT. The researchers concluded that one of the two schools raised its students' scores an average of approximately 25 points each on both verbal and mathematical sections of the test. Staff found that a number of other studies, some funded by the College Board (CB) which sponsors the SAT, has also shown that students could make significant gains on the SAT as a result of participating in a coaching program. Staff also reviewed the descriptive materials regarding the SAT which are provided to students and schools each year by Educational Testing Service and CB. Staff concluded that although the harsh criticism of the CB coaching that had been levied in the late sixties had been modified in more recent materials, even the 1979-80 materials did not appear to recognize the possibility of meaningful score gains through coaching. The CB has indicated its intention to revise descriptive materials in the future. (RL) 
650 1 7 |a Achievement Rating.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a College Admission.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a College Entrance Examinations.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Standardized Tests.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Test Coaching.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED204391.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64394748  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-18-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 191cd6ba-1c3f-58c9-bc60-64457f149d09  |s cf585c48-1e4d-5b49-a0fe-70e9eff92059 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED204391  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1