Rhetorical Analysis and Criticism of Black Rhetors on the Black Language Controversy [electronic resource] : Implications for Education and Society / Dorothy Williamson-Ige.

The rhetoric of black writers and speakers asserts that (1) attitudes and practices toward black language are politically based to keep blacks subordinate to the dominant culture, and (2) African American scholars have a right to determine the meaning and implications of black language. Black rhetor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Williamson-Ige, Dorothy
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1982.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6449269
003 CoU
005 20080221101617.2
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 821101s1982 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed227516 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED227516 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED227516 
100 1 |a Williamson-Ige, Dorothy. 
245 1 0 |a Rhetorical Analysis and Criticism of Black Rhetors on the Black Language Controversy  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Implications for Education and Society /  |c Dorothy Williamson-Ige. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1982. 
300 |a 30 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED227516. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (68th, Louisville, KY, November 4-7, 1982).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a The rhetoric of black writers and speakers asserts that (1) attitudes and practices toward black language are politically based to keep blacks subordinate to the dominant culture, and (2) African American scholars have a right to determine the meaning and implications of black language. Black rhetors contend that even those blacks who speak "standard English" are subject to discrimination, and that embarrassment and subjectivity are often given as excuses for discounting the opinions of black researchers regarding black English. They charge that incorrect conclusions have been drawn by language theorists who are familiar only with the surface culture of the black language, implying that African American scholars come closer to correctly interpreting the language and its meaning. These rhetorical arguments are appropriate in terms of rhetorical effort, in that a strong effort is made in stating their claims and in providing supporting data and examples. The rhetoric is biased, however, from a black perspective. While appropriate for black audiences in agreement, it is inappropriate when dealing with the audience in need of persuasion. At times this rhetoric appears to aim at both black and white audiences. Perhaps the answer is simply to clarify, reinforce ideas, and renew commitments. (HTH) 
650 1 7 |a Black Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Black Dialects.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Blacks.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a English.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Language Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Language Usage.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Linguistic Theory.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Persuasive Discourse.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Racial Bias.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Rhetoric.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Rhetorical Criticism.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Standard Spoken Usage.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED227516.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64492692  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-18-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i a08db0a4-215e-5102-ae2d-b7a1829d2fd3  |s ec691c5f-7eac-5b8a-a539-aebab7bc9c75 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED227516  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1