A faculty office study. design and evaluation [electronic resource] / C. R. Carpenter and Others.

Assuming that adequate offices for serving the needs of faculty and staff members should be planned and constructed as integral parts of facilities, research was conducted and results reported on the design of a two-person faculty and/or staff office. A full scale, prototype model was developed for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Carpenter, C. R.
Corporate Author: Pennsylvania State University. Division of Academic Research and Services
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1961.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6460328
003 CoU
005 20081118081230.7
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 611201s1961 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed020622 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED020622 
100 1 |a Carpenter, C. R. 
245 1 2 |a A faculty office study. design and evaluation  |h [electronic resource] /  |c C. R. Carpenter and Others. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1961. 
300 |a 23 p. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED020622. 
520 |a Assuming that adequate offices for serving the needs of faculty and staff members should be planned and constructed as integral parts of facilities, research was conducted and results reported on the design of a two-person faculty and/or staff office. A full scale, prototype model was developed for the two-person office and tested for economical effectiveness, possible combinations with other office spaces and related facilities. Office location, spatial arrangements for staff offices, and other subjects are discussed prior to presenting the research results. The experimental method, prototype model, solutions, and the test results are described. Communication efficiency, circulation patterns, and construction design are evaluated from the basic model as are similar office modules to test flexibility, expandibility, and convertability. The appendices contain the questionnaire form and statements from faculty interviews used in the evaluation procedure. The idea of providing a full-scale model of several of the proposed offices and evaluating them prior to design for permanent buildings is a technIQue which would appear to be appropriate for the solution of a number of problems which confront designers of educational facilities. (bh) 
650 1 7 |a Building Design.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Construction Needs.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Design Requirements.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Facility Case Studies.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Facility Guidelines.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Models.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Offices (Facilities)  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a Pennsylvania State University.  |b Division of Academic Research and Services. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED020622.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64603283  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-11-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 2  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 54e29129-b6b3-5d2e-a545-292e888a6d31  |s bd66dccf-7c07-5c73-81e7-102a3b491461 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED020622  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1