Independence of Dimensions in Multidimensional Scaling [electronic resource] / Karl Wender.

Models for multidimensional scaling use metric spaces with additive difference metrics. Two important properties of additive difference metrics are decomposability and intradimensional subtractivity. A prediction was derived from these properties and tested experimentally. Eleven non-psychology stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Wender, Karl
Corporate Author: Technische Hochschule Darmstadt (West Germany)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1970.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6479827
003 CoU
005 20090120104451.9
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 700601s1970 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed045732 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED045732 
100 1 |a Wender, Karl. 
245 1 0 |a Independence of Dimensions in Multidimensional Scaling  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Karl Wender. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1970. 
300 |a 19 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED045732. 
520 |a Models for multidimensional scaling use metric spaces with additive difference metrics. Two important properties of additive difference metrics are decomposability and intradimensional subtractivity. A prediction was derived from these properties and tested experimentally. Eleven non-psychology students were used as subjects. Rectangles varying in area and shape served as stimuli. Two types of dissimilarity judgments were obtained: rating scale judgment and pair comparison. In the rating scale experiment two stimuli at a time were shown and the students were asked to judge the overall difference on a scale running from 0 for "no difference" to 8 for "very great difference." In the pair comparisons, slides showed two pairs and the subjects had to judge which of the two pairs showed the larger overall difference. The decomposability and intradimensional subtractivity assumptions of the model were violated by most students due to an apparent interaction between area and shape. The experiment failed to confirm the model and it is suggested that the model be rejected or modified. (Author/LR) 
650 0 7 |a Geometric Concepts.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Mathematical Models.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Multidimensional Scaling.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Research Methodology.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Statistical Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Topology.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Visual Discrimination.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Visual Perception.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a Technische Hochschule Darmstadt (West Germany) 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED045732.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64798276  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-12-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 6daac047-ffc2-5892-bdb5-b01683f6b4f5  |s a7ae51ed-3d3d-583d-a2d6-f63649720c30 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED045732  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1