Evaluation [electronic resource] : MDTA.

Evaluation of the Manpower Development and Training Act (MDTA) programs has been casual and nonconforming, making program improvement difficult. To develop appropriate evaluation techniques, consultants reviewed the objectives and process of MDTA and identified five overlapping and dependent functio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Corporate Author: Minnesota. Department of Education
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1969.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6479894
003 CoU
005 20090120104452.0
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 690901s1969 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed045809 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED045809 
110 1 |a Minnesota.  |b Department of Education. 
245 1 0 |a Evaluation  |h [electronic resource] :  |b MDTA. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1969. 
300 |a 113 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED045809. 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Evaluation of the Manpower Development and Training Act (MDTA) programs has been casual and nonconforming, making program improvement difficult. To develop appropriate evaluation techniques, consultants reviewed the objectives and process of MDTA and identified five overlapping and dependent functions, namely administration, counseling, instruction, learning, and facility. The final instruments utilize self-evaluation for the administration and counseling functions, and self-evaluation and expert evaluation for the instruction and learning functions, while the instrument for evaluating facility involves only expert evaluation. In addition, a computerized analysis system was designed to provide state and local administrators with evaluative program summary data such as training costs and personal characteristics of MDTA trainees. The evaluation instruments are appended as well as sample printouts of the analysis data and computer forms for its implementation. (CD) 
650 1 7 |a Adult Vocational Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation Criteria.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Evaluation Methods.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Federal Programs.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Program Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Questionnaires.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Self Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED045809.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b6479894x  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-12-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i a84fb6bc-7118-5df6-bf00-4e1bd0206b46  |s 5720671c-4a1e-5a8a-aab2-5c58d776c931 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED045809  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1