Interdistrict Arrangements for Student Flow and Regional Planning, California Community Colleges [electronic resource] : Feasibility Study / Peter A. Selo.

Evidence indicates that present arrangements in California community college districts do not always provide the necessary mobility for students to attend college outside their own district. Current practices may encourage duplication of effort, especially with high-cost programs and/or low enrollme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Selo, Peter A.
Corporate Author: California Community Colleges. Office of the Chancellor
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1971.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6482175
003 CoU
005 20090120104454.7
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 710401s1971 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed048849 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
088 |a SR-71-1 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED048849 
100 1 |a Selo, Peter A. 
245 1 0 |a Interdistrict Arrangements for Student Flow and Regional Planning, California Community Colleges  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Feasibility Study /  |c Peter A. Selo. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1971. 
300 |a 48 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED048849. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Two Year Colleges. 
520 |a Evidence indicates that present arrangements in California community college districts do not always provide the necessary mobility for students to attend college outside their own district. Current practices may encourage duplication of effort, especially with high-cost programs and/or low enrollment. This study is concerned with: (1) the identification and assessment of existing interdistrict arrangements for student flow and cooperative planning for joint programs and use of facilities; (2) descriptive analysis of fiscal, legal, jurisdictional, and attitudinal barriers that prevent expansion of interdistrict cooperation; (3) possible alternatives to minimize the major deterrents to cooperative planning and student flow; and (4) development of feasible arrangements in regional planning and cooperation for implementation by districts. (CA) 
650 0 7 |a Attendance.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a College Attendance.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Enrollment.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Regional Cooperation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Regional Planning.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Regional Programs.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Two Year Colleges.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a California Community Colleges.  |b Office of the Chancellor. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED048849.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64821754  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-12-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 9aedefb5-edcf-5576-a056-1954f129d104  |s c4007259-4558-5f28-9e56-d7adb10b73c8 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED048849  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1