The Perils of Bigness [electronic resource] : The Case Against Large School Systems / Peter Coleman.

This paper deals with school system size from the standpoint of costs and community involvement. The first section describes findings of recent studies in Oregon, British Columbia, and Manitoba, regarding the relationship between administrative component size and that of the school system, and the r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Coleman, Peter
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1971.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6490617
003 CoU
005 20081118081258.8
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 710101s1971 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed059529 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED059529 
100 1 |a Coleman, Peter. 
245 1 4 |a The Perils of Bigness  |h [electronic resource] :  |b The Case Against Large School Systems /  |c Peter Coleman. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1971. 
300 |a 26 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED059529. 
520 |a This paper deals with school system size from the standpoint of costs and community involvement. The first section describes findings of recent studies in Oregon, British Columbia, and Manitoba, regarding the relationship between administrative component size and that of the school system, and the relationship between school system size and unit costs. Similar findings for all three jurisdictions reveal that there exists a cost curve wherein costs decrease with increase in system enrollments to a certain optimal point. Beyond that point, costs increase with increases in enrollment. In the second section, some criteria are established for analyzing school systems, and the suggestion is made that insofar as system "bigness" is concerned, three criteria are important: citizen participation in policymaking, program diversity to meet community needs, and flexibility in meeting pressures for innovation. Three case studies of New York, Vancouver, and Toronto are described briefly. (Author/EA) 
650 1 7 |a Administrative Organization.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Citizen Participation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Community Involvement.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Consolidated Schools.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Innovation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Enrollment.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation Criteria.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Policy Formation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Program Improvement.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a School Districts.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a School Size.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Unit Costs.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Urban Schools.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED059529.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64906176  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-12-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 4  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i b0caa466-8be9-5839-916c-2c1183f4f61f  |s c743161b-21b0-5d6c-b6c9-265f7dd6517a 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED059529  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1