Problem Solving Behavior of Teenagers [electronic resource] : An Indicator for Classroom Management / Frederick J. Behrle.

Youth were found to be responsive to a survey when asked for solutions to provocatively disruptive situations. The general purpose of this study was to determine whether these expressed solutions have some useful application to the problems of disruption. Description was measured through a situation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Behrle, Frederick J.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1972.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6498269
003 CoU
005 20081118081309.0
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 720401s1972 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed068862 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED068862 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED068862 
100 1 |a Behrle, Frederick J. 
245 1 0 |a Problem Solving Behavior of Teenagers  |h [electronic resource] :  |b An Indicator for Classroom Management /  |c Frederick J. Behrle. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1972. 
300 |a 18 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED068862. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the convention of the American Orthopsychiatric Association, April 5-8, 1972, Detroit, Michigan.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Youth were found to be responsive to a survey when asked for solutions to provocatively disruptive situations. The general purpose of this study was to determine whether these expressed solutions have some useful application to the problems of disruption. Description was measured through a situational survey and a self-description form filled out by the student along with a teacher rating of the student's behavior. The situational survey consisted of seven specific situations which were provocatively disruptive in nature, followed by a general question about annoying situations. The solutions to the survey were rated according to clinically oriented criteria of disruption. The results were generally minimal as far as any consistent or outstanding patterns of disruption. Signs of disruption in various solutions were not evident in the teacher's or student's self-index of disruption. It was concluded that the survey was valuable as a probe, leading to pertinent questions. (Author/BW) 
650 0 7 |a Adolescents.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Behavior.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Behavior Problems.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Behavioral Science Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Classroom Environment.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Classroom Techniques.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Decision Making.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Discipline Problems.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Problems.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Problem Sets.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Problem Solving.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Productive Thinking.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Rating Scales.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED068862.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b64982695  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-19-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 3a8b733c-4156-5adf-9f93-aa3239568392  |s 276d3149-bb25-59f3-8901-ee07c7ced57b 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED068862  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1