Application of an Instructional Evaluation for University College [electronic resource] / Pietro J. Pascale and Clarence A. Dittenhafer.

In this document, two evaluations of college instruction models are proposed. Model A, a very objective summative evaluation is made utilizing behavioral objectives. The evaluating committee secures copies of the instructor's course examination. The evaluation committee will analyze the examina...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Pascale, Pietro J.
Other Authors: Dittenhafer, Clarence A.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1972.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6500414
003 CoU
005 20081118081311.8
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 720101s1972 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed071569 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED071569 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED071569 
100 1 |a Pascale, Pietro J. 
245 1 0 |a Application of an Instructional Evaluation for University College  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Pietro J. Pascale and Clarence A. Dittenhafer. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1972. 
300 |a 24 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED071569. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
520 |a In this document, two evaluations of college instruction models are proposed. Model A, a very objective summative evaluation is made utilizing behavioral objectives. The evaluating committee secures copies of the instructor's course examination. The evaluation committee will analyze the examination from the standpoint of instructional emphasis, i.e., content, critical thinking, etc. After the examination is given, the instructor will score the students' responses and assign grades. The instructor will pass the examination on to the evaluation committee where student responses will be analyzed in relation to the course objectives as inferred by the committee from examination of the test. The committee would then determine whether or not the instructor was teaching the objectives being tested. In Model B, evaluation would be built into the course planning. The instructor would consult with the evaluation committee and explain the desired outcomes for students in his course. The committee would use the information obtained from the instructor to formulate tentative behavioral objectives for the course. After the course instruction has begun, the evaluation committee could use the instructor's student evaluation procedures to evaluate the instructor. The evaluation would then take the form of Model A in determining the degree of congruency between course objectives and student performance. (HS) 
650 1 7 |a Evaluation Methods.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Improvement.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Dittenhafer, Clarence A. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED071569.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b65004140  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-22-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i ff3e9edc-4a9e-55ef-ad13-7a0b52a58fc6  |s 685c3a13-5d84-592b-a0a8-04389b7b8a26 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED071569  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1