Benefit-Cost Analysis and the Evaluation of Mental Retardation Programs [electronic resource] / William B. Neenan.

The paper describes benefit-cost analysis, reviews how benefit-cost analysis has been used to evaluate human investment as applied to mental retardation programs, and critiques the benefit-cost technique. The first part focuses on problems associated with the definition and measurement of benefits a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Neenan, William B., 1929-2014
Corporate Author: Urban Institute
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1973.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6503984
003 CoU
005 20110310162715.9
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 730301s1973 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed075960 
035 |a (MvI) 7G000000068859 
040 |a ericd  |c MvI  |d MvI 
099 |a ERIC DOC #  |a ED075960 
099 |a ERIC DOC #  |a ED075960 
100 1 |a Neenan, William B.,  |d 1929-2014. 
245 1 0 |a Benefit-Cost Analysis and the Evaluation of Mental Retardation Programs  |h [electronic resource] /  |c William B. Neenan. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1973. 
300 |a 34 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED075960. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Working Paper: 705-93.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a The paper describes benefit-cost analysis, reviews how benefit-cost analysis has been used to evaluate human investment as applied to mental retardation programs, and critiques the benefit-cost technique. The first part focuses on problems associated with the definition and measurement of benefits and costs, the rationale of discounting and the choice of a discount rate, suboptimization, and the question of the distributional impact of programs. In the second part the paucity of benefit-cost evaluations of mental retardation, vocational rehabilitation programs in underlined by reference to some program evaluations which are not benefit-cost studies as well as to the few efforts which do fall within this framework. The concluding section evaluates some of the recent criticisms against benefit-cost analysis. (Author/DB) 
650 1 7 |a Cost Effectiveness.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Exceptional Child Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Expenditure per Student.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Mental Retardation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Program Budgeting.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Program Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Vocational Rehabilitation.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a Urban Institute. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED075960.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b65039841  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-22-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 884b3548-2339-5456-9714-56e6d6ee996d  |s 3e0e0ce8-db0f-559a-adf7-9631252c8c47 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ERIC DOC # ED075960  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1